Ethical generative artificial intelligence and organizational performance: evidence from structural equation modeling and machine learning

Purpose This study examines how the FATAA ethical principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy relate to the usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and, through usage, to organizational performance, with ethical leadership as a contextual moderator. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional theory and behavioral reasoning theory, the study tests a model linking FATAA principles to GenAI usage and, in turn, to organizational performance. A hybrid analytical design combines partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with three machine-learning methods and is applied to survey data from 301 AI-literate professionals. Findings Fairness and accuracy are most strongly associated with GenAI usage, whereas accountability, autonomy and transparency show weaker or non-significant effects. GenAI usage, in turn, is strongly associated with organizational performance, with bootstrapped indirect effects confirming that only fairness and accuracy carry through usage to performance. Ethical leadership is tested as a moderator at both the adoption stage and the performance stage and, notably, neither conditioning effect is supported. Originality/value The study advances the literature in three ways. First, it shows that ethical principles are not equally consequential for GenAI adoption, which calls into question the universalist framing of AI ethics. Second, the hybrid PLS-SEM and machine-learning design surfaces both explanatory effects and feature-level importance, an integration that single-method studies cannot deliver. Third, ethical leadership is examined as a moderator at both the adoption and performance stages, with neither conditioning effect supported, which documents a dual-stage boundary condition for leadership in AI-enabled environments and positions governance-by-design as a candidate explanation for future testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-12-2025-1303
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Ethical generative artificial intelligence and organizational performance: evidence from structural equation modeling and machine learning

Weng Marc Lim, Ahmed Yehia Ebeid, Yaacob Ibrahim
Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ethical generative artificial intelligence and organizational performance: evidence from structural equation modeling and machine learning

Weng Marc Lim, Ahmed Yehia Ebeid, Yaacob Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how the FATAA ethical principles of fairness, accountability, transparency, accuracy and autonomy relate to the usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and, through usage, to organizational performance, with ethical leadership as a contextual moderator. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on institutional theory and behavioral reasoning theory, the study tests a model linking FATAA principles to GenAI usage and, in turn, to organizational performance. A hybrid analytical design combines partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with three machine-learning methods and is applied to survey data from 301 AI-literate professionals. Findings Fairness and accuracy are most strongly associated with GenAI usage, whereas accountability, autonomy and transparency show weaker or non-significant effects. GenAI usage, in turn, is strongly associated with organizational performance, with bootstrapped indirect effects confirming that only fairness and accuracy carry through usage to performance. Ethical leadership is tested as a moderator at both the adoption stage and the performance stage and, notably, neither conditioning effect is supported. Originality/value The study advances the literature in three ways. First, it shows that ethical principles are not equally consequential for GenAI adoption, which calls into question the universalist framing of AI ethics. Second, the hybrid PLS-SEM and machine-learning design surfaces both explanatory effects and feature-level importance, an integration that single-method studies cannot deliver. Third, ethical leadership is examined as a moderator at both the adoption and performance stages, with neither conditioning effect supported, which documents a dual-stage boundary condition for leadership in AI-enabled environments and positions governance-by-design as a candidate explanation for future testing.

Journal of Enterprise Information Management
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (EG), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), Sunway University (MY), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.