System-side perspectives on the evolution of medical claims audits within Meghalaya State-sponsored health insurance scheme: A qualitative study

Background and objectives Description of design adaptation of medical claims audits as critical governance tools within State-funded insurance schemes remain limited. From a system-side perspective, this study examined the evolution of medical claims audits within Meghalaya’s Megha Health Insurance Scheme (MHIS), and how this evolution shaped system behaviour, problem-solving, and perceived scheme performance. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was used. Following review of administrative records, historical performance data, and scoping interactions with MHIS managers, 27 interviews (State administrators, insurers, health insurance experts, healthcare providers) and 3 non-formal interactions with State Nodal Agency leadership were conducted. Thematic analysis was done; findings were validated through health facility visits and a stakeholders meeting. Results Progressive adaptations of medical claims audits included risk-based targeted auditing using high-risk indicators, standardised documentation formats, increasing stringency of discrepancy tolerance thresholds and financial penalties. Stakeholders reported facility improvements (medicine availability, infrastructure, documentation quality), provider-level changes (motivation, digital record systems, clinical confidence), and reduced out-of-pocket expenditure for beneficiaries, alongside evolution of medical claims audits. Meanwhile, increased documentation burden, enrolment constraints, technological disruptions, and claims processing delays were also reported. Participants suggested the need for capacity building, sustained enforcement mechanisms (feedback loops), and iterative system refinement. Interpretation and conclusions In a complex, real-world health system context, medical claims audits led to improved standardisation and discipline of practices within MHIS, with design ability to navigate system constraints, learn, and scale. Medical claims audits served as an efficient problem-resolution, performance empowering instrument and an adaptive governance mechanism within MHIS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Indian Journal of Medical Research
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_565_2026
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

System-side perspectives on the evolution of medical claims audits within Meghalaya State-sponsored health insurance scheme: A qualitative study

Archisman Mohapatra, Ritika Mukherjee, Ramkumar Sathurappan, Divita Sharma et al.
The Indian Journal of Medical Research
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

System-side perspectives on the evolution of medical claims audits within Meghalaya State-sponsored health insurance scheme: A qualitative study

Archisman Mohapatra, Ritika Mukherjee, Ramkumar Sathurappan, Divita Sharma, Manish Pal, Neela E. Kharsahnoh, Rafellia Allya, Fairnolyn Kharshiing, Natus Domine Ladia, Arwanlang Singh Phanbuh, Janupribalas S. Momin
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives Description of design adaptation of medical claims audits as critical governance tools within State-funded insurance schemes remain limited. From a system-side perspective, this study examined the evolution of medical claims audits within Meghalaya’s Megha Health Insurance Scheme (MHIS), and how this evolution shaped system behaviour, problem-solving, and perceived scheme performance. Methods An exploratory qualitative design was used. Following review of administrative records, historical performance data, and scoping interactions with MHIS managers, 27 interviews (State administrators, insurers, health insurance experts, healthcare providers) and 3 non-formal interactions with State Nodal Agency leadership were conducted. Thematic analysis was done; findings were validated through health facility visits and a stakeholders meeting. Results Progressive adaptations of medical claims audits included risk-based targeted auditing using high-risk indicators, standardised documentation formats, increasing stringency of discrepancy tolerance thresholds and financial penalties. Stakeholders reported facility improvements (medicine availability, infrastructure, documentation quality), provider-level changes (motivation, digital record systems, clinical confidence), and reduced out-of-pocket expenditure for beneficiaries, alongside evolution of medical claims audits. Meanwhile, increased documentation burden, enrolment constraints, technological disruptions, and claims processing delays were also reported. Participants suggested the need for capacity building, sustained enforcement mechanisms (feedback loops), and iterative system refinement. Interpretation and conclusions In a complex, real-world health system context, medical claims audits led to improved standardisation and discipline of practices within MHIS, with design ability to navigate system constraints, learn, and scale. Medical claims audits served as an efficient problem-resolution, performance empowering instrument and an adaptive governance mechanism within MHIS.

The Indian Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 0
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.