The Metaphysics of Self-Causality

This article proposes an idealist/panpsychist metaphysics which connects the integrated information theory of consciousness (IIT) with the work of the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: both frameworks describe the whole universe as consisting of different forms of auto-causation — or, as Schopenhauer termed it, ‘the Will’. IIT proposes that consciousness is self-causality: the ‘information’ being measured in a system (e.g. a set of neurons in the brain) is causality (that is, any difference that makes a difference in the future), while ‘integrated’ means the system ultimately has causal power over itself. Schopenhauer, too, claimed that all matter and energy consists of this kind of conscious self-causality, which makes sense according to Charles Darwin’s idea that what is extant is always that which self-perpetuates. The ‘is–ought problem’ is resolved in this article by explaining causality as valence, or the subjectively-experienced difference between good and bad (understood within this theory as satisfaction vs. frustration of causality from its own perspective).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.33.9.087
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Metaphysics of Self-Causality

Chris Nelson
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

The Metaphysics of Self-Causality

Chris Nelson
article en

Abstract

This article proposes an idealist/panpsychist metaphysics which connects the integrated information theory of consciousness (IIT) with the work of the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer: both frameworks describe the whole universe as consisting of different forms of auto-causation — or, as Schopenhauer termed it, ‘the Will’. IIT proposes that consciousness is self-causality: the ‘information’ being measured in a system (e.g. a set of neurons in the brain) is causality (that is, any difference that makes a difference in the future), while ‘integrated’ means the system ultimately has causal power over itself. Schopenhauer, too, claimed that all matter and energy consists of this kind of conscious self-causality, which makes sense according to Charles Darwin’s idea that what is extant is always that which self-perpetuates. The ‘is–ought problem’ is resolved in this article by explaining causality as valence, or the subjectively-experienced difference between good and bad (understood within this theory as satisfaction vs. frustration of causality from its own perspective).

Journal of Consciousness StudiesVol. 33(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.