Ruthenium-catalyzed ammonia decomposition: from interfacial microenvironment design to standardized performance benchmarking
Low volumetric energy density of H 2 makes storage and transport prohibitively expensive, constraining the hydrogen economy. Ammonia (17.6 wt% H 2 ), served by mature global infrastructure, is a practical carbon-free carrier. Ruthenium catalysts set the kinetic benchmark for on-demand H 2 release via ammonia decomposition; their scarcity demands strategies that maximize atom utilization—driving a shift from empirical screening to mechanism-guided design. This review organizes recent progress along two interdependent axes: support-mediated microenvironment modulation and active-center regulation. Tailored matrices—carbons, metal oxides, composites, nitrides, and porous frameworks—regulate Ru dispersion, interfacial charge redistribution, and defect chemistry. Local-environment tuning through size control, low-coordination B5 ensembles, nanoconfinement, and alloying reshapes the energy landscape for N–H cleavage and N 2 recombination. This review integrates three elements that are usually treated separately: coupled support–active-site design, an evidence-constrained mapping of catalyst strategies to elementary steps, and condition-specific performance benchmarking with explicit provenance and normalization boundaries. For 5 wt% Ru/g-C 3 N 4 –AR, the reported 99.01% NH 3 conversion at 500 °C and 18,000 mL g cat −1 h −1 corresponds to a mass-balance-consistent H 2 production rate of 19.8904 mmol g cat −1 min −1 . Because a measured Ru loading and a defensible numerical site count were not available from the supplied primary record, neither a Ru-mass-normalized rate nor a site TOF is assigned. Across the reviewed studies, GHSV, WHSV, F/W, absolute flow, reactor mode, and activity denominators are retained rather than collapsed into nominally common metrics. The resulting framework connects mechanistic evidence to auditable catalyst/condition bundles without implying direct rankability where experimental bases differ.
Authors
- Zaiwang Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-2518)
- Wei Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9167-4313)
- Shijie Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4635-5264)
- Junlei Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5671-6081)
- Fang Yang
- Xiaobing Wang
- Yating Ma
- Yang Guo
- Yongsheng Wu
Institutions
- Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
- Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
- Yunnan University (CN)
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment (CN)
- Inner Mongolia University (CN)
- Shaoguan University (CN)
- Zhejiang Ocean University (CN)
- Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Coordination Chemistry Reviews
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2026.218604
- Primary Topic
- Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00