A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEAD IN DRINKING WATER POLICIES IN THE AMERICAS

Lead (Pb) contamination in drinking water remains a major public health concern across the Americas, driven by aging infrastructure and lead‑containing plumbing materials. Yet the extent of enforceable, actionable policies to prevent exposure is unclear. This study evaluates lead‑in‑water policies across 28 North and South American countries, identifying strengths and gaps in regulatory frameworks aimed at eliminating lead from drinking water. Policies were assessed for monitoring requirements, lead‑source elimination, budget commitments, plumbing material regulations, and enabling policy environments. Documents were sourced using large language models, compiled in a Tableau repository, graded with a standardized system, and visualized with Harvey Balls. Findings show widespread adoption of national drinking water strategies and lead‑related regulations, but persistent gaps in monitoring, enforcement, budget allocation, and actionable lead‑elimination measures. Strengthening policy robustness and enforceability may improve the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks for protecting human health and improving drinking water quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/3m0y-v258
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEAD IN DRINKING WATER POLICIES IN THE AMERICAS

Anna Gold
UNC Libraries
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
article

A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEAD IN DRINKING WATER POLICIES IN THE AMERICAS

Anna Gold
article en

Abstract

Lead (Pb) contamination in drinking water remains a major public health concern across the Americas, driven by aging infrastructure and lead‑containing plumbing materials. Yet the extent of enforceable, actionable policies to prevent exposure is unclear. This study evaluates lead‑in‑water policies across 28 North and South American countries, identifying strengths and gaps in regulatory frameworks aimed at eliminating lead from drinking water. Policies were assessed for monitoring requirements, lead‑source elimination, budget commitments, plumbing material regulations, and enabling policy environments. Documents were sourced using large language models, compiled in a Tableau repository, graded with a standardized system, and visualized with Harvey Balls. Findings show widespread adoption of national drinking water strategies and lead‑related regulations, but persistent gaps in monitoring, enforcement, budget allocation, and actionable lead‑elimination measures. Strengthening policy robustness and enforceability may improve the effectiveness of regulatory frameworks for protecting human health and improving drinking water quality.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A SURVEY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEAD IN DRINKING WATER POLICIES IN THE AMERICAS — Anna Gold · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS