Measuring Legacy Software Systems: A Goal–Question–Metric (GQM)-Based Framework

Legacy software systems continue to support critical organizational operations, yet organizations often lack a structured and quantitative way to assess their actual condition. This paper presents a multidimensional framework based on the Goal–Question–Metric (GQM) paradigm for measuring legacy software systems in organizational technical environments. The framework was developed through GQM sessions, workshops, and discussions with technical leaders and specialists, with an emphasis on objective and quantifiable metrics. It covers seven measurement directions: breadth, depth, risk of slippage toward legacy software systems, software aging coefficient, human technical capability immersion, seasonality, and substitutability. Breadth is further examined through general existence, individual existence, quality, and user functionality. The proposed measures are expressed through interpretable numerical formulations and combined into an overall Legacy Software System Measurement Model for individual software systems. The framework was applied to thirteen software systems across five organizational cases representing public, private, semi-government, and international contexts. The results show that the proposed measures can distinguish acceptable, pre-risk, and risk conditions and reveal differences among systems that may not be identified through software age alone. The framework therefore provides a structured basis for comparing legacy software systems and supporting evidence-based decisions concerning maintenance, modernization, reengineering, and replacement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15194475
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Measuring Legacy Software Systems: A Goal–Question–Metric (GQM)-Based Framework

Abdullah Algarni, Wajdi Aljedebi, Sufian Khamis
Electronics
Software Engineering Research
article

Measuring Legacy Software Systems: A Goal–Question–Metric (GQM)-Based Framework

Abdullah Algarni, Wajdi Aljedebi, Sufian Khamis
article en

Abstract

Legacy software systems continue to support critical organizational operations, yet organizations often lack a structured and quantitative way to assess their actual condition. This paper presents a multidimensional framework based on the Goal–Question–Metric (GQM) paradigm for measuring legacy software systems in organizational technical environments. The framework was developed through GQM sessions, workshops, and discussions with technical leaders and specialists, with an emphasis on objective and quantifiable metrics. It covers seven measurement directions: breadth, depth, risk of slippage toward legacy software systems, software aging coefficient, human technical capability immersion, seasonality, and substitutability. Breadth is further examined through general existence, individual existence, quality, and user functionality. The proposed measures are expressed through interpretable numerical formulations and combined into an overall Legacy Software System Measurement Model for individual software systems. The framework was applied to thirteen software systems across five organizational cases representing public, private, semi-government, and international contexts. The results show that the proposed measures can distinguish acceptable, pre-risk, and risk conditions and reveal differences among systems that may not be identified through software age alone. The framework therefore provides a structured basis for comparing legacy software systems and supporting evidence-based decisions concerning maintenance, modernization, reengineering, and replacement.

ElectronicsVol. 15(19)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.