PS10-8. Tannin Supplementation in Cow-calf Pairs Grazing a Grass Monoculture.

Abstract Cow-calf pairs grazing rangelands rely on grass-based diets that decline in quality over the season, reducing nitrogen (N) use efficiency and increasing enteric methane (CH4) emissions. Grass monocultures also lack plant secondary compounds, such as tannins, which may improve nutrition and reduce environmental impacts. Twenty-four Angus cow-calf pairs grazed six 3.6-ha meadow bromegrass paddocks (4 pairs/paddock) over two consecutive years. All cows received 1 kg/cow/day of DDGs (Control; n = 3 paddocks), while tannin-supplemented cows (TT; n = 3) additionally received a quebracho-chestnut extract included at 0.5% dietary DM. After a basal period, cattle grazed three consecutive 14-d treatment periods (P1, P2, P3). Mixed models included treatment, period, and their interaction as fixed effects; and year, paddock, and animal as random effects; and baseline values as covariate. Biomass removal did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05). TT cows had lower BUN in P3 and lower fecal ADF in P1 than Control cows (P < 0.05), whereas fecal N tended to remain greater in TT cows across periods and urinary N concentration tended to be lower in TT cows during P2 (P = 0.115). Methane production showed no treatment effects for daily emissions, yield, or intensity (P > 0.05). Daily CH4 emissions and CH4 yield peaked in Period 1 and declined in Periods 2–3 for TT cows (P < 0.05), with a smaller decline for Control animals over the same periods (P < 0.05). Across periods, TT cows consistently exhibited numerically lower CH4 emissions, reaching a 20% reduction by Period 3 relative to Control animals. Fecal fiber, N, and CH4 outcomes aligned with body-weight patterns: Cow and calf BW did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05), but TT cows showed less BW loss than Control cows, and calves from TT-supplemented cows gained approximately 7 kg more BW over the study, corresponding to11% greater total gain. Thus, moderate tannin inclusion promoted selection of a higher-quality diet (lower fecal fiber and more fiber remaining in the grazed pasture), improved N-use efficiency, and reduced enteric CH4 emissions by up to 20%, supporting their potential as a strategy to enhance nutrient retention and mitigate environmental impacts in grass-based beef systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.479
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS10-8. Tannin Supplementation in Cow-calf Pairs Grazing a Grass Monoculture.

Juan Jose Villalba, Horacio Blanchard, Nicola Panciroli, Olivier Desrues et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

PS10-8. Tannin Supplementation in Cow-calf Pairs Grazing a Grass Monoculture.

Juan Jose Villalba, Horacio Blanchard, Nicola Panciroli, Olivier Desrues, Claudio Cabral, Iddy Muzzo, XIn Dai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cow-calf pairs grazing rangelands rely on grass-based diets that decline in quality over the season, reducing nitrogen (N) use efficiency and increasing enteric methane (CH4) emissions. Grass monocultures also lack plant secondary compounds, such as tannins, which may improve nutrition and reduce environmental impacts. Twenty-four Angus cow-calf pairs grazed six 3.6-ha meadow bromegrass paddocks (4 pairs/paddock) over two consecutive years. All cows received 1 kg/cow/day of DDGs (Control; n = 3 paddocks), while tannin-supplemented cows (TT; n = 3) additionally received a quebracho-chestnut extract included at 0.5% dietary DM. After a basal period, cattle grazed three consecutive 14-d treatment periods (P1, P2, P3). Mixed models included treatment, period, and their interaction as fixed effects; and year, paddock, and animal as random effects; and baseline values as covariate. Biomass removal did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05). TT cows had lower BUN in P3 and lower fecal ADF in P1 than Control cows (P < 0.05), whereas fecal N tended to remain greater in TT cows across periods and urinary N concentration tended to be lower in TT cows during P2 (P = 0.115). Methane production showed no treatment effects for daily emissions, yield, or intensity (P > 0.05). Daily CH4 emissions and CH4 yield peaked in Period 1 and declined in Periods 2–3 for TT cows (P < 0.05), with a smaller decline for Control animals over the same periods (P < 0.05). Across periods, TT cows consistently exhibited numerically lower CH4 emissions, reaching a 20% reduction by Period 3 relative to Control animals. Fecal fiber, N, and CH4 outcomes aligned with body-weight patterns: Cow and calf BW did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05), but TT cows showed less BW loss than Control cows, and calves from TT-supplemented cows gained approximately 7 kg more BW over the study, corresponding to11% greater total gain. Thus, moderate tannin inclusion promoted selection of a higher-quality diet (lower fecal fiber and more fiber remaining in the grazed pasture), improved N-use efficiency, and reduced enteric CH4 emissions by up to 20%, supporting their potential as a strategy to enhance nutrient retention and mitigate environmental impacts in grass-based beef systems.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Utah State University (US), Louisiana State University Agricultural Center (US), Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.