Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the CLEFT-Q in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Psychometric Evaluation

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the CLEFT-Q in patients with cleft lip and palate.DesignCross-sectional psychometric validation study.SettingSingle-center university hospital in Turkey.Patients, ParticipantsA total of 138 Turkish-speaking patients aged 8-29 years with unilateral or bilateral CLP were included. A subgroup of 45 participants completed the questionnaire twice for test-retest reliability analysis.Main Outcome MeasuresInternal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, Guttman split-half), test-retest reliability (ICC(A,2)), structural validity via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), inter-scale correlations, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated.ResultsAll scales and the Eating/Drinking checklist demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.868 to 0.964. ICC(A,2) values ranged from 0.858 to 0.972, indicating good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. EFA supported a unidimensional structure for all scales. CFA findings were heterogeneous: 3 scales (nostrils, teeth, and jaws) met all predefined criteria; several scales showed partial fit; the Eating/Drinking checklist showed consistently poor fit (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.123; standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.094). Clinically significant floor effects (≥15%) were observed for nostrils and cleft lip scar; ceiling effects for speech distress, psychological function, school, and social function. Inter-scale correlations were broadly consistent with the conceptual structure of the instrument.ConclusionsThe Turkish CLEFT-Q demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Structural validity was variable across scales. The instrument provides partial psychometric support for scale-level use in research contexts; the Eating/Drinking checklist requires further evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261492399
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the CLEFT-Q in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Psychometric Evaluation

Asuman Deniz Gümrü Çelikel, Şerife Kiran Aydil, Beyza Tağrikulu
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the CLEFT-Q in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Psychometric Evaluation

Asuman Deniz Gümrü Çelikel, Şerife Kiran Aydil, Beyza Tağrikulu
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the CLEFT-Q in patients with cleft lip and palate.DesignCross-sectional psychometric validation study.SettingSingle-center university hospital in Turkey.Patients, ParticipantsA total of 138 Turkish-speaking patients aged 8-29 years with unilateral or bilateral CLP were included. A subgroup of 45 participants completed the questionnaire twice for test-retest reliability analysis.Main Outcome MeasuresInternal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, Guttman split-half), test-retest reliability (ICC(A,2)), structural validity via exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), inter-scale correlations, and floor/ceiling effects were evaluated.ResultsAll scales and the Eating/Drinking checklist demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.868 to 0.964. ICC(A,2) values ranged from 0.858 to 0.972, indicating good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. EFA supported a unidimensional structure for all scales. CFA findings were heterogeneous: 3 scales (nostrils, teeth, and jaws) met all predefined criteria; several scales showed partial fit; the Eating/Drinking checklist showed consistently poor fit (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.123; standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.094). Clinically significant floor effects (≥15%) were observed for nostrils and cleft lip scar; ceiling effects for speech distress, psychological function, school, and social function. Inter-scale correlations were broadly consistent with the conceptual structure of the instrument.ConclusionsThe Turkish CLEFT-Q demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability. Structural validity was variable across scales. The instrument provides partial psychometric support for scale-level use in research contexts; the Eating/Drinking checklist requires further evaluation.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Istanbul University (TR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.