Evaluation of Kentucky’s Work Zone Speed Camera Pilot Program

Kentucky introduced automated speed enforcement in work zones to mitigate hazards and improve the safety of motorists and workers. This study describes the impacts of automated speed enforcement at five pilot sites. Researchers analyzed speed data and crash data from pilot sites and paired control sites. The control sites and pilot sites had similar traffic volumes, lane configurations, and functional classifications. Analysis drew on over 15 million individual speed records captured using automated enforcement cameras as well as segment-level speed data from HERE. Active enforcement at pilot sites was associated with lower mean, 85th-percentile, and 99th-percentile vehicle speeds. Average vehicle speeds were 1.0–7.5 mph lower during active enforcement, and fewer vehicles exceeded work zone speed limits. The percentage of vehicles traveling more than 10 mph over the speed limit fell 6–23% during active enforcement. Because motorists also slowed down in work zones at control sites, not all speed reductions observed at pilot sites can be attributed to automated enforcement. After adjusting for differences in speed at control sites during periods of active and inactive enforcement, the net effects of enforcement were modestly positive at interstate pilot sites, but there were no clear reductions in speed on the urban arterial and rural highway included in the study. Due to the short duration of automated enforcement activities, researchers had to rely on naive crash analysis to evaluate safety impacts. This found that at most sites the total number of injury crashes fell following camera deployment, although injuries skewed more severe. Speeding-related crashes were exceedingly uncommon at pilot sites (both before and after camera deployment) and control sites. Overall, the study supports using automated speed enforcement to improve work zone safety, particularly given its effectiveness in reducing 85th- and 99th-percentile speeds (i.e., high-risk speeding).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13023/ktc.rr.2027.04
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Kentucky’s Work Zone Speed Camera Pilot Program

William Nicholas Staats, Xu Zhang, Eric R. Green
UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Evaluation of Kentucky’s Work Zone Speed Camera Pilot Program

William Nicholas Staats, Xu Zhang, Eric R. Green
article en

Abstract

Kentucky introduced automated speed enforcement in work zones to mitigate hazards and improve the safety of motorists and workers. This study describes the impacts of automated speed enforcement at five pilot sites. Researchers analyzed speed data and crash data from pilot sites and paired control sites. The control sites and pilot sites had similar traffic volumes, lane configurations, and functional classifications. Analysis drew on over 15 million individual speed records captured using automated enforcement cameras as well as segment-level speed data from HERE. Active enforcement at pilot sites was associated with lower mean, 85th-percentile, and 99th-percentile vehicle speeds. Average vehicle speeds were 1.0–7.5 mph lower during active enforcement, and fewer vehicles exceeded work zone speed limits. The percentage of vehicles traveling more than 10 mph over the speed limit fell 6–23% during active enforcement. Because motorists also slowed down in work zones at control sites, not all speed reductions observed at pilot sites can be attributed to automated enforcement. After adjusting for differences in speed at control sites during periods of active and inactive enforcement, the net effects of enforcement were modestly positive at interstate pilot sites, but there were no clear reductions in speed on the urban arterial and rural highway included in the study. Due to the short duration of automated enforcement activities, researchers had to rely on naive crash analysis to evaluate safety impacts. This found that at most sites the total number of injury crashes fell following camera deployment, although injuries skewed more severe. Speeding-related crashes were exceedingly uncommon at pilot sites (both before and after camera deployment) and control sites. Overall, the study supports using automated speed enforcement to improve work zone safety, particularly given its effectiveness in reducing 85th- and 99th-percentile speeds (i.e., high-risk speeding).

UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
University of Kentucky (US)
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
Sustainable cities and communities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon