Retaking to succeed: Causal evidence on optional course retaking in college
Many colleges permit course retakes, yet their effects on academic success remain largely unknown. We study a four-year university that canceled a grade-replacement policy in 1995 and reinstated it in 2001. Exploiting these policy shifts and the disproportionate retaking response among D/F students relative to C students, we estimate the causal effects of retaking using an instrumental-variables design. Grade replacement substantially increased retaking among students who initially earned D/F grades. We find broadly robust evidence that retaking improves same-subject persistence and subsequent performance among students who continue in the subject. Estimates for university-level retention and four-year graduation are less robust, ranging from positive to no detectable effects. Overall, grade replacement encourages struggling students to retake courses without harming their short- or longer-run academic progress.
Authors
- Kelly S. Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-864X)
- Xuan Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-0165)
- Yingying Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-4148)
Institutions
- Boise State University (US)
- Jinan University (CN)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2026.107769
- Primary Topic
- Higher Education Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00