Rethinking the role of animal models in adaptive deep brain stimulation: From feasibility to mechanistic and disease-modifying insights

BACKGROUND: Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) has emerged as an advanced neuromodulation approach capable of dynamically adjusting stimulation parameters based on real-time biomarkers, thereby overcoming the limitations of conventional continuous DBS (cDBS). While early animal studies were instrumental in establishing the feasibility and symptomatic efficacy of aDBS, its availability in humans poses the question of whether animal studies are still needed in this field. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to critically reassess the role of animal models in the development and future evolution of aDBS, with particular emphasis on their contribution to mechanistic insights, potential disease-modifying effects, biomarker identification, and the integration of machine learning for next-generation adaptive neuromodulation systems. FINDINGS: Animal studies have provided the foundational evidence for closed-loop neuromodulation, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time sensing-stimulation systems and the initial superiority of aDBS over cDBS in modulating motor symptoms. Preclinical models have enabled the identification and causal validation of electrophysiological and neurochemical biomarkers while also serving as indispensable platforms for hardware innovation, causal circuit interrogation using optogenetics, and validation of machine learning-based adaptive control algorithms. Moreover, animal models offer a unique platform for investigating disease progression, neural plasticity, and stage-dependent effects of stimulation, which remain difficult to assess in human studies. In parallel, machine learning approaches have increasingly leveraged preclinical and clinical data to decode physiological states, optimize stimulation parameters, and dynamically adapt therapy, thus supporting the development of personalized aDBS systems. CONCLUSION: The role of animal models in aDBS research is undergoing a conceptual transition, from demonstrating feasibility and symptomatic efficacy to addressing mechanistic and disease-modifying questions. By enabling causal investigation of neural circuits, hardware development, biomarker validation, and integration with machine learning frameworks, preclinical research remains essential for advancing aDBS toward more precise, adaptive, and potentially disease-modifying neuromodulation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.107009
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Rethinking the role of animal models in adaptive deep brain stimulation: From feasibility to mechanistic and disease-modifying insights

Elena Moro, Sara Meoni, Jens Volkmann, Irene E. Harmsen et al.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Rethinking the role of animal models in adaptive deep brain stimulation: From feasibility to mechanistic and disease-modifying insights

Elena Moro, Sara Meoni, Jens Volkmann, Irene E. Harmsen, Guglielmo Foffani, Hanan Awad Hassan Ali, Sara Renata Francesca Marceglia, Aaron Loh, Alberto Priori, Matteo Guidetti, Andres M. Lozano, Giovanni Signaroldi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) has emerged as an advanced neuromodulation approach capable of dynamically adjusting stimulation parameters based on real-time biomarkers, thereby overcoming the limitations of conventional continuous DBS (cDBS). While early animal studies were instrumental in establishing the feasibility and symptomatic efficacy of aDBS, its availability in humans poses the question of whether animal studies are still needed in this field. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to critically reassess the role of animal models in the development and future evolution of aDBS, with particular emphasis on their contribution to mechanistic insights, potential disease-modifying effects, biomarker identification, and the integration of machine learning for next-generation adaptive neuromodulation systems. FINDINGS: Animal studies have provided the foundational evidence for closed-loop neuromodulation, demonstrating the feasibility of real-time sensing-stimulation systems and the initial superiority of aDBS over cDBS in modulating motor symptoms. Preclinical models have enabled the identification and causal validation of electrophysiological and neurochemical biomarkers while also serving as indispensable platforms for hardware innovation, causal circuit interrogation using optogenetics, and validation of machine learning-based adaptive control algorithms. Moreover, animal models offer a unique platform for investigating disease progression, neural plasticity, and stage-dependent effects of stimulation, which remain difficult to assess in human studies. In parallel, machine learning approaches have increasingly leveraged preclinical and clinical data to decode physiological states, optimize stimulation parameters, and dynamically adapt therapy, thus supporting the development of personalized aDBS systems. CONCLUSION: The role of animal models in aDBS research is undergoing a conceptual transition, from demonstrating feasibility and symptomatic efficacy to addressing mechanistic and disease-modifying questions. By enabling causal investigation of neural circuits, hardware development, biomarker validation, and integration with machine learning frameworks, preclinical research remains essential for advancing aDBS toward more precise, adaptive, and potentially disease-modifying neuromodulation strategies.

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsVol. 191
University Health Network (CA), University of Trieste (IT), Inserm (FR), University of Toronto (CA), University of Milan (IT), University of Würzburg (DE), Toronto Western Hospital (CA), HM Hospitales (ES), Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences (FR), Krembil Research Institute, Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.