Ready for robotic dentistry? a comparative study of trust, behavioral intention, and procedural acceptance

Artificial intelligence and robotic systems are becoming part of dental care, but it remains unclear to what extent dentists, dental students, and non-dental participants would accept receiving robot-assisted dental treatment themselves and how much they trust these technologies. This cross-sectional online survey included 1,055 participants: 542 dental students, 95 practicing dentists, and 418 non-dental participants. The questionnaire assessed perceived usefulness, procedural acceptance, trust and control, social influence, ethics, privacy, and cost, and behavioral intention. All composite scores were calculated on 5-point Likert-type scales, with higher scores indicating greater agreement or acceptance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparisons, the Friedman test, correlation analyses, and hierarchical linear regression. Participants generally considered AI and robotic systems useful, but their willingness to undergo robot-assisted dental procedures was relatively low. Mean scores were 2.95 for perceived usefulness and 2.25 for procedural acceptance. Acceptance differed significantly across the 11 dental procedures, with the highest score for tooth whitening and the lowest for soft-tissue surgery. Dentists showed lower procedural acceptance than both dental students and non-dental participants. The trust and control construct was the strongest predictor of behavioral intention, followed by procedural acceptance and perceived usefulness. The final regression model explained 56.5% of the variance in behavioral intention. Acceptance was generally lower for more invasive procedures, particularly surgical procedures. Acceptance of AI and robotic dentistry was associated more strongly with trust, clinician control, and procedure type than with perceived usefulness alone. Further cross-cultural studies involving multiple countries are needed to confirm these findings in more diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09992-y
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Ready for robotic dentistry? a comparative study of trust, behavioral intention, and procedural acceptance

Gökçe Naz Cömert, Arda Arısan, Derya Sağıroğlu
BMC Oral Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Ready for robotic dentistry? a comparative study of trust, behavioral intention, and procedural acceptance

Gökçe Naz Cömert, Arda Arısan, Derya Sağıroğlu
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and robotic systems are becoming part of dental care, but it remains unclear to what extent dentists, dental students, and non-dental participants would accept receiving robot-assisted dental treatment themselves and how much they trust these technologies. This cross-sectional online survey included 1,055 participants: 542 dental students, 95 practicing dentists, and 418 non-dental participants. The questionnaire assessed perceived usefulness, procedural acceptance, trust and control, social influence, ethics, privacy, and cost, and behavioral intention. All composite scores were calculated on 5-point Likert-type scales, with higher scores indicating greater agreement or acceptance. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparisons, the Friedman test, correlation analyses, and hierarchical linear regression. Participants generally considered AI and robotic systems useful, but their willingness to undergo robot-assisted dental procedures was relatively low. Mean scores were 2.95 for perceived usefulness and 2.25 for procedural acceptance. Acceptance differed significantly across the 11 dental procedures, with the highest score for tooth whitening and the lowest for soft-tissue surgery. Dentists showed lower procedural acceptance than both dental students and non-dental participants. The trust and control construct was the strongest predictor of behavioral intention, followed by procedural acceptance and perceived usefulness. The final regression model explained 56.5% of the variance in behavioral intention. Acceptance was generally lower for more invasive procedures, particularly surgical procedures. Acceptance of AI and robotic dentistry was associated more strongly with trust, clinician control, and procedure type than with perceived usefulness alone. Further cross-cultural studies involving multiple countries are needed to confirm these findings in more diverse populations.

BMC Oral Health
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Ankara Medipol Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.