Constantine’s Great Palace in the Patria: Textual Layers and the Early Palatial Topography of Constantinople
This article examines Patria 1.59-60, the most extensive list of buildings attributed to Constantine within the Great Palace and separates the textual layers that the notice combines. The procedure is philological rather than architectural. Each lemma of the transmitted Greek is tested against the earliest independent attestation of the institution, name, function, or structure it denotes, and the result is left open where no such attestation survives. The fourth-century palace is largely concealed beneath later construction and the modern city, while its most detailed written accounts belong to the Middle Byzantine period. Modern reconstructions have therefore tended to combine evidence produced across several centuries and to project the named spaces of the tenth-century palace back to Constantine. The analysis compares Eusebius, the Notitia Urbis Constantinopolitanae, Malalas, the Chronicon Paschale, the Patria, and the De Ceremoniis by separating the chronologies of institutions, names, functions, and architectural settings. It shows that Patria 1.59-60 is not an inventory of a Constantinian building programme. The passage gathers guard units, fiscal offices, workshops, gates, churches, halls, and baths whose independent attestations range from the fifth to the ninth century. Its attributions express Constantine's place in the historical memory of the palace rather than construction history of every named space. Once these retrospective attributions are separated into chronological layers, the original palace can no longer be recovered as a detailed architectural plan. A more secure reconstruction identifies an upper-terrace residence with a controlled entrance, a principal representative hall, and protected access to the imperial box in the Hippodrome. The Constantinian palace is therefore best understood as a system of movement and regulated visibility. This model preserves the value of later sources while limiting the claims that can be made from them.
Authors
- Hüseyin SALİKOĞLU (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7054-9259)
Institutions
- Muğla University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Gephyra
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.2028817
- Primary Topic
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00