Smart Wearable Technologies for Fall Detection, Risk Assessment, and Prevention in Older Adults: A Review

Falls remain the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality among people aged 65 and older, and the wearable sensor industry has responded with a proliferating set of accelerometer- and gyroscope-based products marketed as fall prevention solutions. This review narrows that broad claim to a specific, testable object: on-body inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems—accelerometers, gyroscopes, and combined IMUs worn on the trunk, waist, wrist, or limb—that perform either (a) real-time post-event fall detection, (b) sub-second pre-impact fall detection intended to trigger a protective response, or (c) prospective, gait-based fall-risk classification of community-dwelling older adults. Drawing on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and individual validation studies published through early 2026, this review (1) organizes recent advances along a clinical nursing closed-loop pathway—risk identification, real-time monitoring and early-warning response, injury protection, and nursing collaboration; (2) traces the sensor-to-algorithm-to-system pipeline from raw inertial signal to alarm; (3) tabulates sensor type, algorithm class, sample composition, accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and false-alarm rate across a representative set of studies; and (4) discusses four adoption-limiting factors: the digital divide, device adherence, privacy, and alarm fatigue. A central finding is that laboratory-simulated-fall accuracy figures (often >95%) do not transfer to real-world, unscripted settings, where sensitivity for actual falls in older cohorts has been reported as low as 55%—80% and false-alarm rates vary by two orders of magnitude across studies and algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.66128/ijaiir202601.5
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Smart Wearable Technologies for Fall Detection, Risk Assessment, and Prevention in Older Adults: A Review

Ying Ma
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
article

Smart Wearable Technologies for Fall Detection, Risk Assessment, and Prevention in Older Adults: A Review

Ying Ma
article en

Abstract

Falls remain the leading cause of injury-related morbidity and mortality among people aged 65 and older, and the wearable sensor industry has responded with a proliferating set of accelerometer- and gyroscope-based products marketed as fall prevention solutions. This review narrows that broad claim to a specific, testable object: on-body inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems—accelerometers, gyroscopes, and combined IMUs worn on the trunk, waist, wrist, or limb—that perform either (a) real-time post-event fall detection, (b) sub-second pre-impact fall detection intended to trigger a protective response, or (c) prospective, gait-based fall-risk classification of community-dwelling older adults. Drawing on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and individual validation studies published through early 2026, this review (1) organizes recent advances along a clinical nursing closed-loop pathway—risk identification, real-time monitoring and early-warning response, injury protection, and nursing collaboration; (2) traces the sensor-to-algorithm-to-system pipeline from raw inertial signal to alarm; (3) tabulates sensor type, algorithm class, sample composition, accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and false-alarm rate across a representative set of studies; and (4) discusses four adoption-limiting factors: the digital divide, device adherence, privacy, and alarm fatigue. A central finding is that laboratory-simulated-fall accuracy figures (often >95%) do not transfer to real-world, unscripted settings, where sensitivity for actual falls in older cohorts has been reported as low as 55%—80% and false-alarm rates vary by two orders of magnitude across studies and algorithms.

Vol. 1(1)
Shanxi Datong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smart Wearable Technologies for Fall Detection, Risk Assessment, and Prevention in Older Adults: A Review — Ying Ma · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS