Why Households Undermine Sustainable Housing Policies: A Behavioral Housing Finance Perspective

Sustainability-oriented housing policies rely on financial incentives, green mortgage products, and energy-efficiency programs to achieve environmental and long-term social objectives. However, their effectiveness remains limited at the household level, raising questions about why these instruments underperform despite growing policy attention and institutional support. While previous research has examined household responses to sustainable housing measures and behavioral influences on housing decisions, less attention has been paid to how behavioral mechanisms interact with mortgage finance in shaping the effectiveness of sustainability-oriented housing policies. This paper addresses this gap by integrating behavioral economics, housing finance and sustainable housing research within a unified perspective. It focuses on the mismatch between policy assumptions and behavioral processes underlying housing and mortgage decisions. Using insights from behavioral housing finance, it develops a conceptual framework that explains how households evaluate and respond to sustainability-related housing interventions. The literature review integrates evidence on behavioral mechanisms and financial constraints and examines their role in housing-related financial decisions and policy responses. The analysis shows that household decisions are driven by short-term affordability concerns, decision heuristics, and subjective perceptions of financial risk. As a result, behavioral mechanisms such as present bias, mental accounting, and framing effects reduce the importance of long-term financial stability and environmental benefits in housing choices. The findings suggest that policy uptake alone is a weak indicator of success, as participation in sustainability-oriented programs does not necessarily translate into lasting behavioral or environmental change. This highlights the importance of aligning housing policy design with household decision-making processes and behavioral realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16193867
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Why Households Undermine Sustainable Housing Policies: A Behavioral Housing Finance Perspective

Erzsébet Printz-Markó, Boglárka Eisinger Balassa, Vivien Gergye
Buildings
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Why Households Undermine Sustainable Housing Policies: A Behavioral Housing Finance Perspective

Erzsébet Printz-Markó, Boglárka Eisinger Balassa, Vivien Gergye
article en

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented housing policies rely on financial incentives, green mortgage products, and energy-efficiency programs to achieve environmental and long-term social objectives. However, their effectiveness remains limited at the household level, raising questions about why these instruments underperform despite growing policy attention and institutional support. While previous research has examined household responses to sustainable housing measures and behavioral influences on housing decisions, less attention has been paid to how behavioral mechanisms interact with mortgage finance in shaping the effectiveness of sustainability-oriented housing policies. This paper addresses this gap by integrating behavioral economics, housing finance and sustainable housing research within a unified perspective. It focuses on the mismatch between policy assumptions and behavioral processes underlying housing and mortgage decisions. Using insights from behavioral housing finance, it develops a conceptual framework that explains how households evaluate and respond to sustainability-related housing interventions. The literature review integrates evidence on behavioral mechanisms and financial constraints and examines their role in housing-related financial decisions and policy responses. The analysis shows that household decisions are driven by short-term affordability concerns, decision heuristics, and subjective perceptions of financial risk. As a result, behavioral mechanisms such as present bias, mental accounting, and framing effects reduce the importance of long-term financial stability and environmental benefits in housing choices. The findings suggest that policy uptake alone is a weak indicator of success, as participation in sustainability-oriented programs does not necessarily translate into lasting behavioral or environmental change. This highlights the importance of aligning housing policy design with household decision-making processes and behavioral realities.

BuildingsVol. 16(19)
Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.