REGULATORY RECURRENCE FOR APPROVAL OF ANDA (GENERIC DRUG) AS PER CDSCO IN INDIA COMPARISON WITH JAPAN

Generic medicines play an important role in providing safe, effective, quality and affordable healthcare. They are developed as equivalent alternatives to brand-name medicines and must meet regulatory requirements for quality, safety, efficacy and bio equivalence. Their availability reduces healthcare expenditure, improves access to essential medicines and promotes competition in the pharmaceutical market. The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is an important pathway for generic drug approval. It allows manufacturers to demonstrate equivalence to a Reference Listed Drug without repeating the complete development programme of the original product. Major requirements include bioequivalence studies, pharmaceutical quality, Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC), current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP), stability testing and impurity control. In India, generic medicines are regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs Rules, 1945 and applicable regulatory requirements. The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) performs important functions related to drug quality, safety, efficacy, clinical trials, marketing authorization, imported drugs, pharmacovigilance and bioavailability/bioequivalence requirements. In Japan, the regulatory framework involves the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). PMDA conducts scientific and technical reviews, inspections and post-marketing safety activities, while MHLW provides final regulatory authorization. This comparative study evaluates the generic drug approval systems of India and Japan, focusing on regulatory requirements, bioequivalence, quality standards, review procedures and patient safety. It highlights major similarities and differences between the two regulatory frameworks and their approaches to ensuring the availability of safe, effective and affordable generic medicines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23031716
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

REGULATORY RECURRENCE FOR APPROVAL OF ANDA (GENERIC DRUG) AS PER CDSCO IN INDIA COMPARISON WITH JAPAN

Dr. P. Ashok Kumar*, Jeevan S, Darshan V. S., Lingaraja N. P., Hemanth M., Kirankumar B. R.
European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

REGULATORY RECURRENCE FOR APPROVAL OF ANDA (GENERIC DRUG) AS PER CDSCO IN INDIA COMPARISON WITH JAPAN

Dr. P. Ashok Kumar*, Jeevan S, Darshan V. S., Lingaraja N. P., Hemanth M., Kirankumar B. R.
article en

Abstract

Generic medicines play an important role in providing safe, effective, quality and affordable healthcare. They are developed as equivalent alternatives to brand-name medicines and must meet regulatory requirements for quality, safety, efficacy and bio equivalence. Their availability reduces healthcare expenditure, improves access to essential medicines and promotes competition in the pharmaceutical market. The Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is an important pathway for generic drug approval. It allows manufacturers to demonstrate equivalence to a Reference Listed Drug without repeating the complete development programme of the original product. Major requirements include bioequivalence studies, pharmaceutical quality, Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC), current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP), stability testing and impurity control. In India, generic medicines are regulated under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs Rules, 1945 and applicable regulatory requirements. The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) performs important functions related to drug quality, safety, efficacy, clinical trials, marketing authorization, imported drugs, pharmacovigilance and bioavailability/bioequivalence requirements. In Japan, the regulatory framework involves the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). PMDA conducts scientific and technical reviews, inspections and post-marketing safety activities, while MHLW provides final regulatory authorization. This comparative study evaluates the generic drug approval systems of India and Japan, focusing on regulatory requirements, bioequivalence, quality standards, review procedures and patient safety. It highlights major similarities and differences between the two regulatory frameworks and their approaches to ensuring the availability of safe, effective and affordable generic medicines.

European Journal Pharmaceutical and Medical Research
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.