To Have Land and Turn and Till It: Land and Black Intergenerational Mobility, 1880–1900

Unlike formerly enslaved people in the South, freedmen in the Cherokee Nation could claim land after emancipation. This policy provides a fruitful environment to evaluate objections to postbellum land distribution, particularly the concern that freedmen and women would be unable to successfully manage farms and their own economic affairs. In this paper, I use a linked sample of Cherokee freedmen families to better understand the dynamics of intra- and intergenerational occupational mobility. I find no evidence that the Cherokee freedmen could not use free land to improve their lives and those of their children. There was a remarkable occupational persistence in the economic status of those who were adults in both 1880 and 1900. Additionally, the next generation of Cherokee freedmen essentially exhibited the ability to maintain or improve their status vis-à-vis their parents. Downward mobility was limited and may be explained by lifecycle effects. Furthermore, increased wealth levels provided the resources for local black communities to self-finance the construction of schools, which helped to ensure that their children had not only physical capital from land acquisition but also the education to use those resources successfully.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Black Political Economy
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446261477706
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

To Have Land and Turn and Till It: Land and Black Intergenerational Mobility, 1880–1900

Melinda C. Miller
The Review of Black Political Economy
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
article

To Have Land and Turn and Till It: Land and Black Intergenerational Mobility, 1880–1900

Melinda C. Miller
article en

Abstract

Unlike formerly enslaved people in the South, freedmen in the Cherokee Nation could claim land after emancipation. This policy provides a fruitful environment to evaluate objections to postbellum land distribution, particularly the concern that freedmen and women would be unable to successfully manage farms and their own economic affairs. In this paper, I use a linked sample of Cherokee freedmen families to better understand the dynamics of intra- and intergenerational occupational mobility. I find no evidence that the Cherokee freedmen could not use free land to improve their lives and those of their children. There was a remarkable occupational persistence in the economic status of those who were adults in both 1880 and 1900. Additionally, the next generation of Cherokee freedmen essentially exhibited the ability to maintain or improve their status vis-à-vis their parents. Downward mobility was limited and may be explained by lifecycle effects. Furthermore, increased wealth levels provided the resources for local black communities to self-finance the construction of schools, which helped to ensure that their children had not only physical capital from land acquisition but also the education to use those resources successfully.

The Review of Black Political Economy
Virginia Tech (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To Have Land and Turn and Till It: Land and Black Intergenerational Mobility, 1880–1900 — Melinda C. Miller · The Review of Black Political Economy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS