Development and validation of the global spectacle independence questionnaire: a brief patient-reported outcome measure with U.S. population norms

Abstract Background To develop and provide initial validation evidence for the Global Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (GSIQ), a patient-reported outcome measure of spectacle independence (SI), and to provide U.S. national norms of SI. Methods Instrument development followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidance. Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted in the U.S. ( N = 36). An online survey ( N = 960) representative of the U.S. adult population collected psychometric data to assess reliability and validity relative to the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42 (NEI-RQL). The primary endpoint, GSIQ-DC, is a dichotomous classification (DC) of SI defined as responding “None of the time” to all three core items (need for vision correction, wearing vision correction, and straining/squinting without correction) during the past 7 days. Results Qualitative interviews identified concepts of spectacle independence and achieved concept saturation. The final GSIQ consists of three core items (plus one optional digital-device item). Exploratory factor analysis supported unidimensionality (60.7% variance explained). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.82); test-retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Convergent validity with theoretically related NEI-RQL subscales was moderate to strong; known-groups analysis and logistic regression further supported validity. In the weighted U.S. normative sample, 18.8% of adults were classified as fully spectacle independent. Conclusions The GSIQ is a concise, reliable patient-reported outcome measure with evidence of validity. Its dichotomous primary endpoint provides a standardized, patient-centered measure of complete spectacle independence for evaluating vision correction interventions across clinical research settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01215-w
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development and validation of the global spectacle independence questionnaire: a brief patient-reported outcome measure with U.S. population norms

Robert Morlock, Nicolaas J. Reus
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Development and validation of the global spectacle independence questionnaire: a brief patient-reported outcome measure with U.S. population norms

Robert Morlock, Nicolaas J. Reus
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To develop and provide initial validation evidence for the Global Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (GSIQ), a patient-reported outcome measure of spectacle independence (SI), and to provide U.S. national norms of SI. Methods Instrument development followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidance. Concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted in the U.S. ( N = 36). An online survey ( N = 960) representative of the U.S. adult population collected psychometric data to assess reliability and validity relative to the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument-42 (NEI-RQL). The primary endpoint, GSIQ-DC, is a dichotomous classification (DC) of SI defined as responding “None of the time” to all three core items (need for vision correction, wearing vision correction, and straining/squinting without correction) during the past 7 days. Results Qualitative interviews identified concepts of spectacle independence and achieved concept saturation. The final GSIQ consists of three core items (plus one optional digital-device item). Exploratory factor analysis supported unidimensionality (60.7% variance explained). Internal consistency was strong (Cronbach’s α = 0.82); test-retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87). Convergent validity with theoretically related NEI-RQL subscales was moderate to strong; known-groups analysis and logistic regression further supported validity. In the weighted U.S. normative sample, 18.8% of adults were classified as fully spectacle independent. Conclusions The GSIQ is a concise, reliable patient-reported outcome measure with evidence of validity. Its dichotomous primary endpoint provides a standardized, patient-centered measure of complete spectacle independence for evaluating vision correction interventions across clinical research settings.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and validation of the global spectacle independence questionnaire: a brief patient-reported outcome measure with U.S. population norms — Robert Morlock, Nicolaas J. Reus · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS