Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Paracetamol Compared with Intramuscular Tramadol for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract Background: Pain management is essential in labor. While regional analgesia is the gold standard, it often requires resources and expertise not widely available in low-resource settings. Intravenous paracetamol and intramuscular tramadol are potential alternatives, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain inadequately studied. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous paracetamol versus intramuscular tramadol for labor analgesia. Materials and Methods: This open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included 189 parturients in active labor. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1000 mg intravenous paracetamol (Group A) or 100 mg intramuscular tramadol (Group B). Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at baseline/admission (0 h), and at three points thereafter (1, 2, and 3 h). The primary outcome was mean pain duration; secondary outcomes included maternal and fetal side effects, need for rescue analgesia, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 28 for Windows at 95% confidence interval (CI). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no significant differences in pain scores between the paracetamol and tramadol groups at baseline (0 h) or at subsequent assessments (1, 2, and 3 h). The mean pain scores were as follows: 8.21 ± 1.56 versus 8.24 ± 1.48 ( P = 0.907) at baseline; 7.42 ± 1.67 versus 7.27 ± 1.72 ( P = 0.549) at 1 h; 7.48 ± 1.83 versus 7.44 ± 1.82 ( P = 0.920) at 2 h; and 7.53 ± 2.30 versus 7.79 ± 2.40 ( P = 0.561) at 3 h. However, fewer women in the paracetamol group required rescue analgesia compared to the tramadol group (19.7% vs. 31.9%; relative risk = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.24–0.86; P < 0.010). Maternal side effects—including nausea, vomiting, and sedation—and neonatal appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration scores were comparable between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous paracetamol is a safe and effective alternative to intramuscular tramadol for labor analgesia, with comparable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Larger multicenter studies are recommended to enhance external validity. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06371144.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medicine and Health Development
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmh.ijmh_160_25
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Paracetamol Compared with Intramuscular Tramadol for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Joshua Adeniyi Adebayo, Assumpta Nnenna Nweke, Charles Nwambeke Edene, Chinomnso Stella MARCEL-ONWUDIWE et al.
International Journal of Medicine and Health Development
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Paracetamol Compared with Intramuscular Tramadol for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Joshua Adeniyi Adebayo, Assumpta Nnenna Nweke, Charles Nwambeke Edene, Chinomnso Stella MARCEL-ONWUDIWE, Darlington-Peter Chibuzor Ugoji, Ifeoma Cecilia Uche-Omovoh, Uzoma Ogbonna-Onwukwe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pain management is essential in labor. While regional analgesia is the gold standard, it often requires resources and expertise not widely available in low-resource settings. Intravenous paracetamol and intramuscular tramadol are potential alternatives, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain inadequately studied. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous paracetamol versus intramuscular tramadol for labor analgesia. Materials and Methods: This open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial included 189 parturients in active labor. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 1000 mg intravenous paracetamol (Group A) or 100 mg intramuscular tramadol (Group B). Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale at baseline/admission (0 h), and at three points thereafter (1, 2, and 3 h). The primary outcome was mean pain duration; secondary outcomes included maternal and fetal side effects, need for rescue analgesia, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 28 for Windows at 95% confidence interval (CI). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no significant differences in pain scores between the paracetamol and tramadol groups at baseline (0 h) or at subsequent assessments (1, 2, and 3 h). The mean pain scores were as follows: 8.21 ± 1.56 versus 8.24 ± 1.48 ( P = 0.907) at baseline; 7.42 ± 1.67 versus 7.27 ± 1.72 ( P = 0.549) at 1 h; 7.48 ± 1.83 versus 7.44 ± 1.82 ( P = 0.920) at 2 h; and 7.53 ± 2.30 versus 7.79 ± 2.40 ( P = 0.561) at 3 h. However, fewer women in the paracetamol group required rescue analgesia compared to the tramadol group (19.7% vs. 31.9%; relative risk = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.24–0.86; P < 0.010). Maternal side effects—including nausea, vomiting, and sedation—and neonatal appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration scores were comparable between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous paracetamol is a safe and effective alternative to intramuscular tramadol for labor analgesia, with comparable maternal and neonatal outcomes. Larger multicenter studies are recommended to enhance external validity. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06371144.

International Journal of Medicine and Health DevelopmentVol. 31(4)
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (NG), Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu-Alike, David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences Uburu (NG)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.