From Mathematical Practice to Minimal Mathematical Realism

Mathematical practice exhibits a pervasive lack of freedom: once relevant assumptions and rules are fixed, practitioners do not appear free to choose what follows. In this paper, I develop Minimal Mathematical Realism (MMR), according to which an Autonomous Mathematical Reality (AMR) underlies this phenomenon, while making no initial assumption about its intrinsic character or organisation. At this minimal level, the usual distinction between realist and non-realist accounts becomes less clear, since approaches rejecting familiar realist ontologies may nevertheless be compatible with MMR. The inference to an AMR is abductive: it provides a straightforward explanation of the stable mathematical determinations encountered across practitioners, representations, and domains. The differentiated character of these determinations also provides grounds for tentatively characterising the AMR, without assuming that familiar mathematical categories reproduce its intrinsic organisation. More speculatively, MMR raises the possibility that mathematical reality itself is non-optional: its non-existence may simply not be an alternative.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23037843
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

From Mathematical Practice to Minimal Mathematical Realism

Georges Quénot
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
preprint

From Mathematical Practice to Minimal Mathematical Realism

Georges Quénot
preprint en

Abstract

Mathematical practice exhibits a pervasive lack of freedom: once relevant assumptions and rules are fixed, practitioners do not appear free to choose what follows. In this paper, I develop Minimal Mathematical Realism (MMR), according to which an Autonomous Mathematical Reality (AMR) underlies this phenomenon, while making no initial assumption about its intrinsic character or organisation. At this minimal level, the usual distinction between realist and non-realist accounts becomes less clear, since approaches rejecting familiar realist ontologies may nevertheless be compatible with MMR. The inference to an AMR is abductive: it provides a straightforward explanation of the stable mathematical determinations encountered across practitioners, representations, and domains. The differentiated character of these determinations also provides grounds for tentatively characterising the AMR, without assuming that familiar mathematical categories reproduce its intrinsic organisation. More speculatively, MMR raises the possibility that mathematical reality itself is non-optional: its non-existence may simply not be an alternative.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Mathematical Practice to Minimal Mathematical Realism — Georges Quénot · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS