Admission Surprise Question Response and Its Association with Advance Care Planning Documentation and Palliative Care Consultation: A Multisite Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Background: The Surprise Question (SQ) asks providers, “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?”. It is a tool that was developed to help providers identify patients who would benefit from palliative care (PC) interventions. There is limited research on whether the provider’s response to the SQ at the time of hospital admission influences the quality of care and clinical outcomes in the inpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the impact of the SQ response at the time of hospital admission on the initiation and timing of PC interventions during hospitalization. Design: This was a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study assessing the association between the SQ response and the presence and timing of advance care planning (ACP) documentation and PC consultation. Setting/Participants: The study included hospitalized patients admitted to the Hospital Medicine service across three New York University Langone Health sites in New York City over a five-year period (2020–2025) with a discharge disposition of “expired” or discharged to hospice care (inpatient or outpatient). Results: After propensity matching, 8,970 encounters were analyzed. Patients with an SQ response of “No” on admission had higher odds of having ACP documentation or PC consultation (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–1.49) compared to those with a response of “Yes.” In addition, patients with a “No” response had ACP documentation or PC consultation an average of 2.7 days earlier than those with a “Yes” response (CI −2.9 to −2.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An SQ response of “No” at the time of admission was associated with an increased likelihood and earlier timing of PC interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10966218261488922
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Admission Surprise Question Response and Its Association with Advance Care Planning Documentation and Palliative Care Consultation: A Multisite Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Jesse Burk‐Rafel, Benjamin Verplanke, Veerawat Phongtankuel, KOLBY JOHNSON et al.
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Admission Surprise Question Response and Its Association with Advance Care Planning Documentation and Palliative Care Consultation: A Multisite Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Jesse Burk‐Rafel, Benjamin Verplanke, Veerawat Phongtankuel, KOLBY JOHNSON, Ankita Agarwal, Lauren Messing, Heather Menzer
article en

Abstract

Background: The Surprise Question (SQ) asks providers, “Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next year?”. It is a tool that was developed to help providers identify patients who would benefit from palliative care (PC) interventions. There is limited research on whether the provider’s response to the SQ at the time of hospital admission influences the quality of care and clinical outcomes in the inpatient setting. Aim: To evaluate the impact of the SQ response at the time of hospital admission on the initiation and timing of PC interventions during hospitalization. Design: This was a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study assessing the association between the SQ response and the presence and timing of advance care planning (ACP) documentation and PC consultation. Setting/Participants: The study included hospitalized patients admitted to the Hospital Medicine service across three New York University Langone Health sites in New York City over a five-year period (2020–2025) with a discharge disposition of “expired” or discharged to hospice care (inpatient or outpatient). Results: After propensity matching, 8,970 encounters were analyzed. Patients with an SQ response of “No” on admission had higher odds of having ACP documentation or PC consultation (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–1.49) compared to those with a response of “Yes.” In addition, patients with a “No” response had ACP documentation or PC consultation an average of 2.7 days earlier than those with a “Yes” response (CI −2.9 to −2.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An SQ response of “No” at the time of admission was associated with an increased likelihood and earlier timing of PC interventions.

Journal of Palliative Medicine
Cornell University (US), NYU Langone Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.