Fundamental kinematic indicators predict surgical expertise and clinical outcomes in robot-assisted surgery

Abstract The global proliferation of robotic surgical platforms necessitates a framework for objective skill assessment using fundamental kinematic features that are theoretically extractable from any robotic system with 3D position tracking. Here, we demonstrated that fundamental three-dimensional movement patterns alone can accurately distinguish surgical expertise and show associations with clinical outcomes. A Random Forest classifier discriminated expertise with high case-wise accuracy (area under the curve 0.892 ± 0.075), and feature-importance analysis identified left-hand peak density as the principal discriminator. A small set of these fundamental indicators generalized to unseen surgeons in leave-one-surgeon-out validation, localizing the expertise-associated signal to a few interpretable kinematic measures. Kinematic patterns were correlated with clinical outcomes, and exploratory analysis revealed associations between movement features and blood loss. Individual learning curve analysis revealed heterogeneous adaptation patterns among experts transitioning to the new platform and identified distinct phenotypes with implications for personalized training. These findings show that fundamental kinematic analysis using only three-dimensional positional data can provide interpretable indicators of surgical performance that may extend across robotic systems providing coordinate data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03137-9
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Fundamental kinematic indicators predict surgical expertise and clinical outcomes in robot-assisted surgery

Hideto Ueki, Naoto Wakita, Yukari Bando, Munenori Uemura et al.
npj Digital Medicine
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Fundamental kinematic indicators predict surgical expertise and clinical outcomes in robot-assisted surgery

Hideto Ueki, Naoto Wakita, Yukari Bando, Munenori Uemura, Takuto Hara, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Koji Chiba, Hideaki Miyake, Akihisa Yao, Kiyoyuki Chinzei, Jun Teishima, Kotaro Suzuki, Tomoko Yamaguchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract The global proliferation of robotic surgical platforms necessitates a framework for objective skill assessment using fundamental kinematic features that are theoretically extractable from any robotic system with 3D position tracking. Here, we demonstrated that fundamental three-dimensional movement patterns alone can accurately distinguish surgical expertise and show associations with clinical outcomes. A Random Forest classifier discriminated expertise with high case-wise accuracy (area under the curve 0.892 ± 0.075), and feature-importance analysis identified left-hand peak density as the principal discriminator. A small set of these fundamental indicators generalized to unseen surgeons in leave-one-surgeon-out validation, localizing the expertise-associated signal to a few interpretable kinematic measures. Kinematic patterns were correlated with clinical outcomes, and exploratory analysis revealed associations between movement features and blood loss. Individual learning curve analysis revealed heterogeneous adaptation patterns among experts transitioning to the new platform and identified distinct phenotypes with implications for personalized training. These findings show that fundamental kinematic analysis using only three-dimensional positional data can provide interpretable indicators of surgical performance that may extend across robotic systems providing coordinate data.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 9(1)
Kobe University (JP), Kumamoto University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.