Selection of central venous access devices for neonates: an expert review

INTRODUCTION: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are essential for managing neonates requiring prolonged intravenous therapy. However, selecting the most appropriate CVAD remains complex due to population heterogeneity and variation in clinical practice, healthcare resources, and models of care. AREAS COVERED: This expert review synthesizes current evidence and clinical guidance to support neonatal CVAD selection. It examines four major CVAD types - umbilical venous catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters, tunneled CVADs, and non-tunneled CVADs - focusing on their indications, contraindications, dwell times, and complication profiles. Device selection is discussed in relation to neonatal characteristics, therapy requirements, long-term vessel preservation, economic considerations, and healthcare context. This review integrates existing evidence to support individualized, context-informed decision-making across diverse models of care and identifies priorities for future research. EXPERT OPINION: Optimal CVAD selection is not merely a technical decision but a strategic clinical process that integrates patient, therapy, device, and health-system factors. Existing frameworks provide valuable guidance and should be interpreted within the clinical context in which they are applied, acknowledging differences in expertise, available resources, and models of care. Continued advances in evidence generation, implementation, and neonatal-specific device innovation are essential to improving both immediate and lifelong vascular outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2741518
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Selection of central venous access devices for neonates: an expert review

Tricia M. Kleidon, Mari De La Rosa Takashima, Pranav R. Jani, Henrik Hjelmgren et al.
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Selection of central venous access devices for neonates: an expert review

Tricia M. Kleidon, Mari De La Rosa Takashima, Pranav R. Jani, Henrik Hjelmgren, Sabrina de Souza, Samantha J. Keogh, Deanne L. August, Amanda Judith Ullman, Mary Beth Davis, Alina G Bureke
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are essential for managing neonates requiring prolonged intravenous therapy. However, selecting the most appropriate CVAD remains complex due to population heterogeneity and variation in clinical practice, healthcare resources, and models of care. AREAS COVERED: This expert review synthesizes current evidence and clinical guidance to support neonatal CVAD selection. It examines four major CVAD types - umbilical venous catheters, peripherally inserted central catheters, tunneled CVADs, and non-tunneled CVADs - focusing on their indications, contraindications, dwell times, and complication profiles. Device selection is discussed in relation to neonatal characteristics, therapy requirements, long-term vessel preservation, economic considerations, and healthcare context. This review integrates existing evidence to support individualized, context-informed decision-making across diverse models of care and identifies priorities for future research. EXPERT OPINION: Optimal CVAD selection is not merely a technical decision but a strategic clinical process that integrates patient, therapy, device, and health-system factors. Existing frameworks provide valuable guidance and should be interpreted within the clinical context in which they are applied, acknowledging differences in expertise, available resources, and models of care. Continued advances in evidence generation, implementation, and neonatal-specific device innovation are essential to improving both immediate and lifelong vascular outcomes.

Expert Review of Medical Devices
Griffith University (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital (US), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.