Preliminary observations from a decameter-scale field test of fracture thermal energy storage: Initial and induced in-situ stress and its impact on fluid flow

We present preliminary data, results, and analysis from the first decameter-scale test of fracture thermal energy storage. The test took place at the Sanford Underground Research Facility 1250 m underground in an amphibolite test bed comprising five boreholes connected by a stimulated fracture network. The system was “charged” by injecting hot water in the central borehole while producing from the others, and subsequently “discharged” by injecting ambient temperature in the peripheral boreholes while producing from the center borehole. During the charging phase more than 60% of the injected water was recovered but during the discharging phase recovery rates were less than 10%. Significant compressive stress heterogeneity on the fracture network (> 4 MPa difference) existed between boreholes before hot water injection and was exacerbated (up to ∼ 9 MPa) during hot water injection. We observed a strong correlation between the compressive stress gradient on the fracture network and the injection impedance between boreholes. Our results suggest that adding thermal energy to our system induced poroelastic and thermoelastic effects that exacerbated existing compressive stress heterogeneity on the fracture network. This, in turn, guided fluid flow away from the areas of highest compressive stress (near the center borehole) towards areas of lower compressive stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geothermics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2026.103858
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Preliminary observations from a decameter-scale field test of fracture thermal energy storage: Initial and induced in-situ stress and its impact on fluid flow

Joseph Pope, Jeffrey Burghardt, Dana Sirota, Matthew Ingraham et al.
Geothermics
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Preliminary observations from a decameter-scale field test of fracture thermal energy storage: Initial and induced in-situ stress and its impact on fluid flow

Joseph Pope, Jeffrey Burghardt, Dana Sirota, Matthew Ingraham, Leon E. Hibbard, Taylor Myers
article en

Abstract

We present preliminary data, results, and analysis from the first decameter-scale test of fracture thermal energy storage. The test took place at the Sanford Underground Research Facility 1250 m underground in an amphibolite test bed comprising five boreholes connected by a stimulated fracture network. The system was “charged” by injecting hot water in the central borehole while producing from the others, and subsequently “discharged” by injecting ambient temperature in the peripheral boreholes while producing from the center borehole. During the charging phase more than 60% of the injected water was recovered but during the discharging phase recovery rates were less than 10%. Significant compressive stress heterogeneity on the fracture network (> 4 MPa difference) existed between boreholes before hot water injection and was exacerbated (up to ∼ 9 MPa) during hot water injection. We observed a strong correlation between the compressive stress gradient on the fracture network and the injection impedance between boreholes. Our results suggest that adding thermal energy to our system induced poroelastic and thermoelastic effects that exacerbated existing compressive stress heterogeneity on the fracture network. This, in turn, guided fluid flow away from the areas of highest compressive stress (near the center borehole) towards areas of lower compressive stress.

GeothermicsVol. 143
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.