When the Recovery and Resilience Facility hits home: EU crisis governance and recentralisation in federal and quasi-federal member states

This article examines whether the implementation of the RRF has contributed to a shift in decision-making powers from subnational authorities to central governments. To do so, it reconstructs the drafting and implementation of National Recovery and Resilience Plans in Italy, Germany, Belgium, and Spain, four federal or quasi-federal member states, and examines the multi-level implementation of reforms in childcare, eldercare, and vocational training. Although the findings show a heterogeneity of governance practices across the cases, including decentralised and centralised approaches, the latter predominate. The RRF’s strengthening of EU oversight does not automatically erode subnational authority, but it provides opportunities for central executives to recentralise competences. These opportunities are mediated by different domestic architectures of self-rule and shared rule, the latter aspect becoming pivotal to understand the effects of EU integration upon federal arrangements. More broadly, the article shows how EU performance-based financing can strengthen executive dominance within decentralised member states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2026.2736768
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

When the Recovery and Resilience Facility hits home: EU crisis governance and recentralisation in federal and quasi-federal member states

Joan Miró, Marie-Thérèse Wilhelm
Journal of European Integration
Political Systems and Governance
article

When the Recovery and Resilience Facility hits home: EU crisis governance and recentralisation in federal and quasi-federal member states

Joan Miró, Marie-Thérèse Wilhelm
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether the implementation of the RRF has contributed to a shift in decision-making powers from subnational authorities to central governments. To do so, it reconstructs the drafting and implementation of National Recovery and Resilience Plans in Italy, Germany, Belgium, and Spain, four federal or quasi-federal member states, and examines the multi-level implementation of reforms in childcare, eldercare, and vocational training. Although the findings show a heterogeneity of governance practices across the cases, including decentralised and centralised approaches, the latter predominate. The RRF’s strengthening of EU oversight does not automatically erode subnational authority, but it provides opportunities for central executives to recentralise competences. These opportunities are mediated by different domestic architectures of self-rule and shared rule, the latter aspect becoming pivotal to understand the effects of EU integration upon federal arrangements. More broadly, the article shows how EU performance-based financing can strengthen executive dominance within decentralised member states.

Journal of European Integration
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When the Recovery and Resilience Facility hits home: EU crisis governance and recentralisation in federal and quasi-federal member states — Joan Miró, Marie-Thérèse Wilhelm · Journal of European Integration (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS