PS7-15. National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP): Harmonized Databases, Reproducible Modeling, and Artificial Intelligence-enabled Knowledge Synthesis for Animal Nutrition Research.

Abstract Livestock and companion animal nutrition research increasingly depends on harmonized datasets and reproducible modeling workflows to synthesize evidence across feeds, genetics, environments, and management practices. The National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP; NRSP-9) supports this need for beef, dairy, swine, poultry, and horse systems by providing curated, research-based databases, modeling resources, and training that enable model development, parameterization, evaluation, and benchmarking. Core assets include a feed ingredient composition database with >4 million records and an animal performance and metabolism database with >500,000 observations; both are operational and publicly accessible. Recent infrastructure modernization includes website restructuring, Shiny-based decision tools, evaluation of alternative hosting platforms to reduce long-term costs, and hybrid R/Python workflows to enhance interoperability, provenance tracking, and end-to-end reproducibility. To strengthen transparency and corrective software stewardship, the NANP Modeling Committee established a formal process to identify, document, and route technical issues in widely used national nutrition modeling resources to original developers for recompilation and version correction, reinforcing accountability, consistent versioning, and reproducible benchmarking across releases. The latest strategic advancement is the development of a NANP Large Language Model (LLM) system using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to support structured knowledge synthesis while respecting copyright and licensing constraints. Deployment options include public GPU-hosted servers and stand-alone local installations to balance cost, accessibility, and data governance. These initiatives align with priorities in Bayesian modeling, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision science, digital twins, and sustainability analytics, including methane accounting and integration with feed life-cycle assessment. Training and workforce development remain central, with modular modeling education, symposium integration, and certification concepts under development. Collectively, NANP strengthens national modeling infrastructure, improves reproducibility, supports corrective software governance, and advances AI-integrated decision support for animal nutrition research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.470
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS7-15. National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP): Harmonized Databases, Reproducible Modeling, and Artificial Intelligence-enabled Knowledge Synthesis for Animal Nutrition Research.

M.D. Hanigan, Sarah H White-Springer, Todd R. Callaway, M.J. VandeHaar et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

PS7-15. National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP): Harmonized Databases, Reproducible Modeling, and Artificial Intelligence-enabled Knowledge Synthesis for Animal Nutrition Research.

M.D. Hanigan, Sarah H White-Springer, Todd R. Callaway, M.J. VandeHaar, Aline Remus, Hector M Menendez, Mingyung Lee, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi, Heidi A. Rossow, P.R. Ferket, Jordan Melissa Adams, Timothy J. Hackmann, Edgar Orlando Oviedo-Rondon, Julia Travassos
article en

Abstract

Abstract Livestock and companion animal nutrition research increasingly depends on harmonized datasets and reproducible modeling workflows to synthesize evidence across feeds, genetics, environments, and management practices. The National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP; NRSP-9) supports this need for beef, dairy, swine, poultry, and horse systems by providing curated, research-based databases, modeling resources, and training that enable model development, parameterization, evaluation, and benchmarking. Core assets include a feed ingredient composition database with >4 million records and an animal performance and metabolism database with >500,000 observations; both are operational and publicly accessible. Recent infrastructure modernization includes website restructuring, Shiny-based decision tools, evaluation of alternative hosting platforms to reduce long-term costs, and hybrid R/Python workflows to enhance interoperability, provenance tracking, and end-to-end reproducibility. To strengthen transparency and corrective software stewardship, the NANP Modeling Committee established a formal process to identify, document, and route technical issues in widely used national nutrition modeling resources to original developers for recompilation and version correction, reinforcing accountability, consistent versioning, and reproducible benchmarking across releases. The latest strategic advancement is the development of a NANP Large Language Model (LLM) system using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to support structured knowledge synthesis while respecting copyright and licensing constraints. Deployment options include public GPU-hosted servers and stand-alone local installations to balance cost, accessibility, and data governance. These initiatives align with priorities in Bayesian modeling, artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled decision science, digital twins, and sustainability analytics, including methane accounting and integration with feed life-cycle assessment. Training and workforce development remain central, with modular modeling education, symposium integration, and certification concepts under development. Collectively, NANP strengthens national modeling infrastructure, improves reproducibility, supports corrective software governance, and advances AI-integrated decision support for animal nutrition research and practice.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), North Carolina State University (US), University of Georgia (US), South Dakota State University (US), University of California, Davis (US), Michigan State University (US), Texas A&M University (US), Colorado State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.