Authoritarian Memory Politics: State Erasure, Manipulation, and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance

Forgetting and remembering are inherently linked to politics, and this relationship is even more pronounced in authoritarian regimes where autocrats can manipulate and control memory without institutional and societal constraints. This study analyzes the politics of memory within an authoritarian regime by theorizing about the interaction between authoritarian rule and the cultural-political ecosystem. It explores how the state-led erasure of memory and construction of a dominant memory discourse collaboratively produce and sustain cultural hegemony. Simultaneously, counter-hegemonic resistance challenges cultural hegemony. Memories of the COVID-19 pandemic in China are used as a case study to illustrate authoritarian memory politics. The empirical analysis employs rich materials, including interviews, government archives, and social media posts, to illustrate the politics of memory within an authoritarian context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary China
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2026.2737134
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Authoritarian Memory Politics: State Erasure, Manipulation, and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance

Yida Zhai
Journal of Contemporary China
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Authoritarian Memory Politics: State Erasure, Manipulation, and Counter-Hegemonic Resistance

Yida Zhai
article en

Abstract

Forgetting and remembering are inherently linked to politics, and this relationship is even more pronounced in authoritarian regimes where autocrats can manipulate and control memory without institutional and societal constraints. This study analyzes the politics of memory within an authoritarian regime by theorizing about the interaction between authoritarian rule and the cultural-political ecosystem. It explores how the state-led erasure of memory and construction of a dominant memory discourse collaboratively produce and sustain cultural hegemony. Simultaneously, counter-hegemonic resistance challenges cultural hegemony. Memories of the COVID-19 pandemic in China are used as a case study to illustrate authoritarian memory politics. The empirical analysis employs rich materials, including interviews, government archives, and social media posts, to illustrate the politics of memory within an authoritarian context.

Journal of Contemporary China
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.