Optimizing image quality in low-dose, low-iodine coronary CT angiography: a comparative study of iterative reconstruction strengths

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying strengths of the Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithm on image quality in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed at 70 kVp tube voltage and low-concentration iodine contrast agent (iomeprol 300 mgI/ml). A prospective study included 107 patients undergoing CCTA, divided into two independent groups, Group A ( n = 52) and Group B ( n = 55). Group A utilized 70 kVp and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) with an injection dose of 1.0 ml/kg at a flow rate of 5.0 ml/s using 300 mgI/ml iodine contrast. Images were reconstructed using FBP (A0), ADMIRE 1 (A1), ADMIRE 3 (A3), and ADMIRE 5 (A5). Group B used 120 kVp and 350 mgI/ml iodine contrast with the same scanning parameters, reconstructing only FBP (B0). Objective image quality was assessed through CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR Coronary ), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR coronary to fat ), and image noise (SD). Two radiologists independently evaluated coronary CTA image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. No significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or HR were observed between groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with Group B, Group A showed a 72.4% reduction in CTDIvol (12.28 ± 3.68 mGy vs. 44.44 ± 12.75 mGy; p < 0.001) and an 18.6% reduction in IU ( p < 0.01). No significant differences in coronary CT values were observed among A0–A5 ( p > 0.05). Within the “dual-low” Group A, image noise decreased significantly as the ADMIRE reconstruction strength increased from A0 to A5 (aortic root SD: 69.71 to 41.19, p < 0.001), while SNR Coronary and CNR coronary to fat improved markedly ( p < 0.001), and subjective image quality scores increased significantly ( p < 0.001). Notably, images reconstructed with the highest strength A5 algorithm showed better objective SNR Coronary /CNR coronary to fat and subjective scores than standard dose B0 images; images reconstructed with the A3 algorithm exhibited comparable image quality compared to B0 images. The combination of 70 kVp and low-concentration iodine contrast (300 mgI/ml) with ADMIRE reconstruction can significantly reduce radiation and iodine burden while achieving comparable or better image quality than standard dose (SDCT). ADMIRE 3 meets traditional standards, and ADMIRE 5 offers further optimization. This study confirms the feasibility of “dual-low” combined with high-strength iterative reconstruction techniques in clinical practice, providing optimized parameters for CCTA examinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02831-0
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Optimizing image quality in low-dose, low-iodine coronary CT angiography: a comparative study of iterative reconstruction strengths

梅习龙, Hu Junjiao, Haitao YANG, Weijun Situ et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Optimizing image quality in low-dose, low-iodine coronary CT angiography: a comparative study of iterative reconstruction strengths

梅习龙, Hu Junjiao, Haitao YANG, Weijun Situ, Kai Deng, Bo Jiang, Xi Guo
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying strengths of the Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithm on image quality in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed at 70 kVp tube voltage and low-concentration iodine contrast agent (iomeprol 300 mgI/ml). A prospective study included 107 patients undergoing CCTA, divided into two independent groups, Group A ( n = 52) and Group B ( n = 55). Group A utilized 70 kVp and automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) with an injection dose of 1.0 ml/kg at a flow rate of 5.0 ml/s using 300 mgI/ml iodine contrast. Images were reconstructed using FBP (A0), ADMIRE 1 (A1), ADMIRE 3 (A3), and ADMIRE 5 (A5). Group B used 120 kVp and 350 mgI/ml iodine contrast with the same scanning parameters, reconstructing only FBP (B0). Objective image quality was assessed through CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR Coronary ), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR coronary to fat ), and image noise (SD). Two radiologists independently evaluated coronary CTA image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. No significant differences in age, sex, BMI, or HR were observed between groups (all p > 0.05). Compared with Group B, Group A showed a 72.4% reduction in CTDIvol (12.28 ± 3.68 mGy vs. 44.44 ± 12.75 mGy; p < 0.001) and an 18.6% reduction in IU ( p < 0.01). No significant differences in coronary CT values were observed among A0–A5 ( p > 0.05). Within the “dual-low” Group A, image noise decreased significantly as the ADMIRE reconstruction strength increased from A0 to A5 (aortic root SD: 69.71 to 41.19, p < 0.001), while SNR Coronary and CNR coronary to fat improved markedly ( p < 0.001), and subjective image quality scores increased significantly ( p < 0.001). Notably, images reconstructed with the highest strength A5 algorithm showed better objective SNR Coronary /CNR coronary to fat and subjective scores than standard dose B0 images; images reconstructed with the A3 algorithm exhibited comparable image quality compared to B0 images. The combination of 70 kVp and low-concentration iodine contrast (300 mgI/ml) with ADMIRE reconstruction can significantly reduce radiation and iodine burden while achieving comparable or better image quality than standard dose (SDCT). ADMIRE 3 meets traditional standards, and ADMIRE 5 offers further optimization. This study confirms the feasibility of “dual-low” combined with high-strength iterative reconstruction techniques in clinical practice, providing optimized parameters for CCTA examinations.

BMC Medical Imaging
Central South University (CN), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.