Automated Point-Of-Care Assessment Metrics for Surgical Residents Performing Consultations: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Surgical resident assessment remains largely dependent on faculty observation and subjective evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) metadata may enable scalable, objective assessment of resident performance during time-sensitive surgical consultations. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a proof-of-concept study of postgraduate-year-2 general surgery residents performing consultations for adults across three hospitals from July 2020 through June 2025. EHR audit-log data were used to measure consultation duration and medication reconciliation. Performance was compared across residents and between early (#1-50) and late (#150-200) consultations. Multivariate regression adjusted for patient age, sex, multimorbidity, consultation reason, hospital, inpatient versus emergency department location, shift assignment, and consultation volume per 12-hour shift. RESULTS: Fifty-eight residents performed 19,139 consultations (median 328 per resident; range 200-440). Median consultation duration was 3.4 hours (IQR 1.5 hours), and medication reconciliation was completed for 71% of consultations (IQR 11%; range 47%-86%). Both metrics varied across residents (p<0.001), and unadjusted and risk-adjusted resident rankings were similar. With increasing experience, residents completed consultations 18% faster (p=0.002), without a significant change in medication reconciliation completion (p=0.22). Within-resident variation in consultation duration decreased with experience (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EHR metadata can generate automated, objective measures of surgical resident consultation performance across a large number of clinical encounters. Resident-level variation and increasing consistency with experience suggest that, after further validation and an extension of the metrics to additional domains, this novel platform will provide a complement to existing assessments. This approach may also provide an objectivity not currently available, and could empower residents with timely, real-world data to inform their practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000002234
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Automated Point-Of-Care Assessment Metrics for Surgical Residents Performing Consultations: A Pilot Study

Gary E. Weissman, Rachael C. Acker, Rachel Rapaport Kelz, Isaac J. Perron et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Automated Point-Of-Care Assessment Metrics for Surgical Residents Performing Consultations: A Pilot Study

Gary E. Weissman, Rachael C. Acker, Rachel Rapaport Kelz, Isaac J. Perron, Sarah I. Landau, Charles C. Horn, Ari Friedman, Kaley Piersanti, Charles T Bradford, J Walker Rosenthal
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical resident assessment remains largely dependent on faculty observation and subjective evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) metadata may enable scalable, objective assessment of resident performance during time-sensitive surgical consultations. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a proof-of-concept study of postgraduate-year-2 general surgery residents performing consultations for adults across three hospitals from July 2020 through June 2025. EHR audit-log data were used to measure consultation duration and medication reconciliation. Performance was compared across residents and between early (#1-50) and late (#150-200) consultations. Multivariate regression adjusted for patient age, sex, multimorbidity, consultation reason, hospital, inpatient versus emergency department location, shift assignment, and consultation volume per 12-hour shift. RESULTS: Fifty-eight residents performed 19,139 consultations (median 328 per resident; range 200-440). Median consultation duration was 3.4 hours (IQR 1.5 hours), and medication reconciliation was completed for 71% of consultations (IQR 11%; range 47%-86%). Both metrics varied across residents (p<0.001), and unadjusted and risk-adjusted resident rankings were similar. With increasing experience, residents completed consultations 18% faster (p=0.002), without a significant change in medication reconciliation completion (p=0.22). Within-resident variation in consultation duration decreased with experience (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EHR metadata can generate automated, objective measures of surgical resident consultation performance across a large number of clinical encounters. Resident-level variation and increasing consistency with experience suggest that, after further validation and an extension of the metrics to additional domains, this novel platform will provide a complement to existing assessments. This approach may also provide an objectivity not currently available, and could empower residents with timely, real-world data to inform their practices.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.