Automated Point-Of-Care Assessment Metrics for Surgical Residents Performing Consultations: A Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: Surgical resident assessment remains largely dependent on faculty observation and subjective evaluation. Electronic health record (EHR) metadata may enable scalable, objective assessment of resident performance during time-sensitive surgical consultations. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a proof-of-concept study of postgraduate-year-2 general surgery residents performing consultations for adults across three hospitals from July 2020 through June 2025. EHR audit-log data were used to measure consultation duration and medication reconciliation. Performance was compared across residents and between early (#1-50) and late (#150-200) consultations. Multivariate regression adjusted for patient age, sex, multimorbidity, consultation reason, hospital, inpatient versus emergency department location, shift assignment, and consultation volume per 12-hour shift. RESULTS: Fifty-eight residents performed 19,139 consultations (median 328 per resident; range 200-440). Median consultation duration was 3.4 hours (IQR 1.5 hours), and medication reconciliation was completed for 71% of consultations (IQR 11%; range 47%-86%). Both metrics varied across residents (p<0.001), and unadjusted and risk-adjusted resident rankings were similar. With increasing experience, residents completed consultations 18% faster (p=0.002), without a significant change in medication reconciliation completion (p=0.22). Within-resident variation in consultation duration decreased with experience (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EHR metadata can generate automated, objective measures of surgical resident consultation performance across a large number of clinical encounters. Resident-level variation and increasing consistency with experience suggest that, after further validation and an extension of the metrics to additional domains, this novel platform will provide a complement to existing assessments. This approach may also provide an objectivity not currently available, and could empower residents with timely, real-world data to inform their practices.
Authors
- Gary E. Weissman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9588-3819)
- Rachael C. Acker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-3183)
- Rachel Rapaport Kelz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-5961)
- Isaac J. Perron (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-6189)
- Sarah I. Landau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5015-7696)
- Charles C. Horn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-3912)
- Ari Friedman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8308-6441)
- Kaley Piersanti
- Charles T Bradford
- J Walker Rosenthal
Institutions
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000002234
- Primary Topic
- Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00