The Obligation Outlives the Cap: Why Agent Payment Rails Bound the Charge, Not the Authority
Autonomous software agents can now both pay and be paid through a dense, fast-maturing set of products and protocols (AP2, ACP, MPP, Visa Intelligent Commerce, Nevermined and others). Read from their own specifications and announcements, nearly all of them bound the charge — the discrete transfer of value; none bounds the agent's authority to incur an obligation: a subscription, postpaid terms or an invoice relationship that outlives the cap and the account. The paper names this problem class (obligation ≠ charge), sets out escalating levels of delegation risk (error → obligation → illegality), and sketches a first-principles legal model: making the presence or absence of correct-class human authorization machine-verifiable at each contract node, so that an unauthorized agent-incurred obligation becomes self-evidently void rather than something the human must later repudiate at cost. Landscape as of June 2026; MPP and related research as of September 2026. Bilingual: two independent originals, English and Russian.
Authors
- Dmitriy Bush (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1045-0599)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23040064
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00