Teaching Hallucination Literacy in Medical Education: A Claim-Level Verification Framework and Toolkit

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence can produce fluent, persuasive responses that intermix accurate, unsupported, outdated, and fabricated information. Therefore, recommendations to simply “verify the output” are insufficient as a teachable competency. We operationalize hallucination literacy as five observable competencies: deconstructing AI responses into discrete claims, identifying required evidence, calibrating verification burden to the clinical context and consequences of error, evaluating evidence or obtaining accountable expert review, and documenting a final verification decision. The framework includes a model-agnostic verification workflow, claim verification matrix, worked example, instructional sequence, and formative assessment rubric for journal clubs, evidence-based medicine curricula, scholarly writing, and supervised clinical reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Educator
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-026-02907-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Teaching Hallucination Literacy in Medical Education: A Claim-Level Verification Framework and Toolkit

Hubert Otho Ballard, Hunter Colson
Medical Science Educator
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Teaching Hallucination Literacy in Medical Education: A Claim-Level Verification Framework and Toolkit

Hubert Otho Ballard, Hunter Colson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence can produce fluent, persuasive responses that intermix accurate, unsupported, outdated, and fabricated information. Therefore, recommendations to simply “verify the output” are insufficient as a teachable competency. We operationalize hallucination literacy as five observable competencies: deconstructing AI responses into discrete claims, identifying required evidence, calibrating verification burden to the clinical context and consequences of error, evaluating evidence or obtaining accountable expert review, and documenting a final verification decision. The framework includes a model-agnostic verification workflow, claim verification matrix, worked example, instructional sequence, and formative assessment rubric for journal clubs, evidence-based medicine curricula, scholarly writing, and supervised clinical reasoning.

Medical Science Educator
University of Kentucky HealthCare (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching Hallucination Literacy in Medical Education: A Claim-Level Verification Framework and Toolkit — Hubert Otho Ballard, Hunter Colson · Medical Science Educator (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS