Culture and Emotion Regulation

Emotion regulation involves attempts to influence emotional expressions or experiences. The nature of emotion regulation depends on people's values and theories of emotion, which vary by culture. We argue that there exist distinct cultural differences in the regulation of emotional expressions and of emotional experiences. People in more interdependent cultures (e.g., East Asian cultures) may be more motivated to regulate emotional expressions than people in more independent cultures (e.g., US culture), but the opposite may be true for regulating emotional experiences. Because interdependent cultures prioritize what happens between people, regulating emotional expressions, which happen between people, is prioritized. The “right” expressions in such cultures are typically of low intensity. In contrast, because independent cultures prioritize what happens within people, regulating emotional experiences, which happen within people, may be prioritized. The “right” experiences in such cultures are typically high in pleasure and low in displeasure. These priorities elicit different motivations, strategies, and implications of emotion regulation across cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-110625-121512
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Culture and Emotion Regulation

Yuri Miyamoto, Yulia E. Chentsova-Dutton, Maya Tamir
Annual Review of Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Culture and Emotion Regulation

Yuri Miyamoto, Yulia E. Chentsova-Dutton, Maya Tamir
article en

Abstract

Emotion regulation involves attempts to influence emotional expressions or experiences. The nature of emotion regulation depends on people's values and theories of emotion, which vary by culture. We argue that there exist distinct cultural differences in the regulation of emotional expressions and of emotional experiences. People in more interdependent cultures (e.g., East Asian cultures) may be more motivated to regulate emotional expressions than people in more independent cultures (e.g., US culture), but the opposite may be true for regulating emotional experiences. Because interdependent cultures prioritize what happens between people, regulating emotional expressions, which happen between people, is prioritized. The “right” expressions in such cultures are typically of low intensity. In contrast, because independent cultures prioritize what happens within people, regulating emotional experiences, which happen within people, may be prioritized. The “right” experiences in such cultures are typically high in pleasure and low in displeasure. These priorities elicit different motivations, strategies, and implications of emotion regulation across cultures.

Annual Review of Psychology
Hitotsubashi University (JP), Georgetown University (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Culture and Emotion Regulation — Yuri Miyamoto, Yulia E. Chentsova-Dutton, et al. · Annual Review of Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS