Navigating Gender and Sexuality in Indonesian Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher Strategies and Institutional Constraints

ABSTRACT Gender and sexuality topics surface routinely in cross‐cultural language classrooms, yet how teachers navigate these encounters in non‐English foreign language contexts remains largely unexplored. This qualitative study examines how teachers of Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA; Indonesian for Foreign Speakers) respond to learner‐initiated questions about gender and sexuality, the factors shaping their pedagogical decisions, and the training and policy infrastructure available to them. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 50 BIPA teachers from public ( n = 33), private ( n = 12), and state Islamic universities ( n = 5) across six Indonesian island groups, analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. All participants confirmed that foreign learners routinely raised questions about gender‐ and sexuality‐related vocabulary (86%), cultural norms and relationships (74%), comparative cultural inquiry (58%), and intersections of Islam and sexuality (44%). Four response strategies were identified: cultural explanation (62%), defensive framing (38%), deflection and redirection (30%), and humor (22%). A pronounced institutional gradient shaped strategy selection: cultural explanation predominated at public universities (70%), whereas deflection was universal in state Islamic universities. Three intersecting factors influenced pedagogical decisions: religious and moral values (76%), institutional climate and perceived risk (52%), and regional context (42%). Not a single participant had received training on gender or sexuality in language education, and none reported specific institutional guidelines, yet 82% expressed a desire for professional development. These findings reveal a structural silence that truncates intercultural competence and reproduces heteronormative and gender‐normative assumptions, underscoring the urgent need for curricular integration of gender and sexuality literacy, professional development, and institutional guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.70071
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Navigating Gender and Sexuality in Indonesian Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher Strategies and Institutional Constraints

Bima Mhd Ghaluh
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Gender Studies in Language
article

Navigating Gender and Sexuality in Indonesian Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher Strategies and Institutional Constraints

Bima Mhd Ghaluh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gender and sexuality topics surface routinely in cross‐cultural language classrooms, yet how teachers navigate these encounters in non‐English foreign language contexts remains largely unexplored. This qualitative study examines how teachers of Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA; Indonesian for Foreign Speakers) respond to learner‐initiated questions about gender and sexuality, the factors shaping their pedagogical decisions, and the training and policy infrastructure available to them. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 50 BIPA teachers from public ( n = 33), private ( n = 12), and state Islamic universities ( n = 5) across six Indonesian island groups, analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. All participants confirmed that foreign learners routinely raised questions about gender‐ and sexuality‐related vocabulary (86%), cultural norms and relationships (74%), comparative cultural inquiry (58%), and intersections of Islam and sexuality (44%). Four response strategies were identified: cultural explanation (62%), defensive framing (38%), deflection and redirection (30%), and humor (22%). A pronounced institutional gradient shaped strategy selection: cultural explanation predominated at public universities (70%), whereas deflection was universal in state Islamic universities. Three intersecting factors influenced pedagogical decisions: religious and moral values (76%), institutional climate and perceived risk (52%), and regional context (42%). Not a single participant had received training on gender or sexuality in language education, and none reported specific institutional guidelines, yet 82% expressed a desire for professional development. These findings reveal a structural silence that truncates intercultural competence and reproduces heteronormative and gender‐normative assumptions, underscoring the urgent need for curricular integration of gender and sexuality literacy, professional development, and institutional guidelines.

Sexuality Gender & PolicyVol. 9(4)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Gender and Sexuality in Indonesian Foreign Language Classrooms: Teacher Strategies and Institutional Constraints — Bima Mhd Ghaluh · Sexuality Gender & Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS