Assessing a multicomponent quality improvement strategy for chronic care of cardiovascular diseases in India: The C-QIP randomized feasibility trial

Background Chronic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) care quality remains suboptimal, globally. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and preliminary effect of a multicomponent, collaborative quality improvement (C-QIP) strategy among patients with CVD attending outpatient clinics in India. Methods and findings In this pragmatic feasibility randomized controlled trial, 410 adults with ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure attending four public and private hospitals were randomized to C-QIP (electronic decision support for providers, non-physician care coordination, patient education, text-message reminders, and audit-feedback) or usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility, fidelity, adoption, and acceptability; secondary outcomes included guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), self-reported adherence, care processes, and risk factors. At end of study (median follow-up 15 months), retention was 192/206 (93.2%) in C-QIP and 187/204 (91.7%) in usual care. Fidelity was high: 187/198 (94.4%) C-QIP participants received lifestyle counseling at end of study. C-QIP increased GDMT use for ischemic heart disease (58.3% versus 32.4%; relative risk [RR] 1.45, 95% CI [1.18, 1.78]) and ischemic stroke (76.7% versus 31.8%; RR 2.41, 95% CI [1.52, 3.81]), but not heart failure. Self-reported adherence was higher for medications (90.9% versus 82.3%; RR 1.08, 95% CI [1.04, 1.12]), diet (91.9% versus 82.3%; RR 1.07, 95% CI [1.02, 1.13]), and physical activity (91.4% versus 70.4%; RR 1.23, 95% CI [1.16, 1.30]). Limitations include feasibility design, individual randomization within shared clinics, and limited power for clinical outcomes and subgroup analysis. Conclusions The C-QIP trial demonstrated that a multicomponent strategy is feasible, acceptable, and improved chronic CVD care processes in India. Future large, confirmatory hybrid trials are needed to establish whether such quality improvement strategies can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Trial Registrations NCT05196659 ; CTRI/2022/04/041847

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Medicine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004932
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing a multicomponent quality improvement strategy for chronic care of cardiovascular diseases in India: The C-QIP randomized feasibility trial

Girish MP, Meetushi Jain, Dimple Kondal, Kalyani Nikhare et al.
PLoS Medicine
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Assessing a multicomponent quality improvement strategy for chronic care of cardiovascular diseases in India: The C-QIP randomized feasibility trial

Girish MP, Meetushi Jain, Dimple Kondal, Kalyani Nikhare, Devraj Jindal, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Satish Gurunathrao Patil, Nikhil Tandon, Emily Mendenhall, Kamar Ali, Mohit Dayal Gupta, Kavita Singh, K.M. Venkat Narayan, Shivani Anil Patel, Ambuj Roy, Mark D. Huffman, Kiran Ramchandra Aithal, Savitesh Kushwaha, Mareesha Gandral, Kushal Madan, J.P.S. Sawhney
article en

Abstract

Background Chronic cardiovascular diseases (CVD) care quality remains suboptimal, globally. We assessed the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and preliminary effect of a multicomponent, collaborative quality improvement (C-QIP) strategy among patients with CVD attending outpatient clinics in India. Methods and findings In this pragmatic feasibility randomized controlled trial, 410 adults with ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure attending four public and private hospitals were randomized to C-QIP (electronic decision support for providers, non-physician care coordination, patient education, text-message reminders, and audit-feedback) or usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility, fidelity, adoption, and acceptability; secondary outcomes included guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), self-reported adherence, care processes, and risk factors. At end of study (median follow-up 15 months), retention was 192/206 (93.2%) in C-QIP and 187/204 (91.7%) in usual care. Fidelity was high: 187/198 (94.4%) C-QIP participants received lifestyle counseling at end of study. C-QIP increased GDMT use for ischemic heart disease (58.3% versus 32.4%; relative risk [RR] 1.45, 95% CI [1.18, 1.78]) and ischemic stroke (76.7% versus 31.8%; RR 2.41, 95% CI [1.52, 3.81]), but not heart failure. Self-reported adherence was higher for medications (90.9% versus 82.3%; RR 1.08, 95% CI [1.04, 1.12]), diet (91.9% versus 82.3%; RR 1.07, 95% CI [1.02, 1.13]), and physical activity (91.4% versus 70.4%; RR 1.23, 95% CI [1.16, 1.30]). Limitations include feasibility design, individual randomization within shared clinics, and limited power for clinical outcomes and subgroup analysis. Conclusions The C-QIP trial demonstrated that a multicomponent strategy is feasible, acceptable, and improved chronic CVD care processes in India. Future large, confirmatory hybrid trials are needed to establish whether such quality improvement strategies can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Trial Registrations NCT05196659 ; CTRI/2022/04/041847

PLoS MedicineVol. 23(9)
Emory University (US), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), Georgetown University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Heidelberg University (DE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (IN), Centre for Chronic Disease Control (IN), SDM College of Medical Science and Hospital (IN), Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital (IN), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (PK), Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (DE), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Public Health Foundation of India (IN), University of Abuja (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.