Toward Solidarity in Democratic Theory and Practice

I seek to demonstrate that solidarity should be understood as a vital good of democracy, one that is internally, inextricably related to the more familiar democratic values of equality and freedom. Acknowledging solidarity as a vital democratic good, I argue, involves recognizing that democracy entails political agents continually creating for each other the conditions to act as free equals. I build my democratic case for solidarity on Jürgen Habermas’s argument for the co-originality of solidarity with freedom and equality. In particular, I show how a concept crucial to Habermas’s argument, interdependence, can be translated from its original context—discourse ethics and moral agency—to the context of politics and political agency. In doing so, I posit three essential forms of political interdependence: practical, skillful, and ideological interdependence. Drawing on this translation of Habermas’s theory, I explore an immanent movement toward solidarity in three distinct new literatures in political theory that make a place for contentious, extra-institutional practices in democracy. This exploration sets the stage for elaborating a new conception of solidarity highlighting political interdependence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Politics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759272610591x
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Toward Solidarity in Democratic Theory and Practice

John Medearis
Perspectives on Politics
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Toward Solidarity in Democratic Theory and Practice

John Medearis
article en

Abstract

I seek to demonstrate that solidarity should be understood as a vital good of democracy, one that is internally, inextricably related to the more familiar democratic values of equality and freedom. Acknowledging solidarity as a vital democratic good, I argue, involves recognizing that democracy entails political agents continually creating for each other the conditions to act as free equals. I build my democratic case for solidarity on Jürgen Habermas’s argument for the co-originality of solidarity with freedom and equality. In particular, I show how a concept crucial to Habermas’s argument, interdependence, can be translated from its original context—discourse ethics and moral agency—to the context of politics and political agency. In doing so, I posit three essential forms of political interdependence: practical, skillful, and ideological interdependence. Drawing on this translation of Habermas’s theory, I explore an immanent movement toward solidarity in three distinct new literatures in political theory that make a place for contentious, extra-institutional practices in democracy. This exploration sets the stage for elaborating a new conception of solidarity highlighting political interdependence.

Perspectives on Politics
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.