PS6-3. Enhancing Methane Emissions Modeling Through Feature Engineering and Machine Learning.

Abstract Enteric methane produced by beef cattle is a major greenhouse gas and represents a loss of feed energy, making accurate prediction of methane emissions an important step toward developing effective mitigation strategies and improved production performance. This study evaluated the effectiveness of predictive models for estimating methane emissions from ruminant data by comparing tree-based machine learning models with traditional regression approaches. A dataset compiled from multiple experimental studies on enteric methane emissions in beef cattle was used (895 entries), that contained variables such as dry matter intake (DMI), dietary composition such as crude protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF), treatment descriptions, methane emissions expressed in g/day or g/kg DMI (methane yield), along with measurement methodologies including respiration chambers and hood/headbox systems. Seven predictive algorithms were trained and evaluated to predict methane yield: Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Results showed that tree-based ensemble models consistently outperformed traditional linear models across multiple evaluation metrics. Among these, XGBoost demonstrated the strongest predictive performance, achieving a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.77 and the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.65 g/kg DMI, compared to Linear and Regularized regression models (CCC< 0.57). Model interpretability using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis further revealed that the ensemble models effectively identified key biological drivers of methane production, highlighting Dietary Fiber and DMI as the most influential predictors. Overall, the findings indicate that tree-based machine learning approaches, particularly XGBoost, provide a more accurate and flexible framework for predicting enteric methane yield than conventional statistical methods, as they can capture high-dimensional interactions among dietary variables while maintaining interpretability aligned with established ruminant physiology. These results also demonstrate the potential for combining recursive feature selection to aid interpretable machine learning models, that can be used in low resource systems to support the development of precise and data-driven methane mitigation strategies in beef production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag272.396
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

PS6-3. Enhancing Methane Emissions Modeling Through Feature Engineering and Machine Learning.

Jay Yan, Karun Kaniyamattam, Serinmary Pulikkottil Rejimon, Aushmeet Singh et al.
Journal of Animal Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

PS6-3. Enhancing Methane Emissions Modeling Through Feature Engineering and Machine Learning.

Jay Yan, Karun Kaniyamattam, Serinmary Pulikkottil Rejimon, Aushmeet Singh, Keshav Vidjeabaskaran, Sreekar Veeranki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Enteric methane produced by beef cattle is a major greenhouse gas and represents a loss of feed energy, making accurate prediction of methane emissions an important step toward developing effective mitigation strategies and improved production performance. This study evaluated the effectiveness of predictive models for estimating methane emissions from ruminant data by comparing tree-based machine learning models with traditional regression approaches. A dataset compiled from multiple experimental studies on enteric methane emissions in beef cattle was used (895 entries), that contained variables such as dry matter intake (DMI), dietary composition such as crude protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF), treatment descriptions, methane emissions expressed in g/day or g/kg DMI (methane yield), along with measurement methodologies including respiration chambers and hood/headbox systems. Seven predictive algorithms were trained and evaluated to predict methane yield: Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Decision Tree Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Results showed that tree-based ensemble models consistently outperformed traditional linear models across multiple evaluation metrics. Among these, XGBoost demonstrated the strongest predictive performance, achieving a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.77 and the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.65 g/kg DMI, compared to Linear and Regularized regression models (CCC< 0.57). Model interpretability using SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis further revealed that the ensemble models effectively identified key biological drivers of methane production, highlighting Dietary Fiber and DMI as the most influential predictors. Overall, the findings indicate that tree-based machine learning approaches, particularly XGBoost, provide a more accurate and flexible framework for predicting enteric methane yield than conventional statistical methods, as they can capture high-dimensional interactions among dietary variables while maintaining interpretability aligned with established ruminant physiology. These results also demonstrate the potential for combining recursive feature selection to aid interpretable machine learning models, that can be used in low resource systems to support the development of precise and data-driven methane mitigation strategies in beef production systems.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104(Supplement_5)
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.