Coding protocol: provenance of quantified binding provisions in Trondheim statutory planning instruments

This record documents the study’s coding framework and its amendment history. Earlier versions remain available unchanged so that the development of the protocol can be inspected over time. Version 3 update (September 2026). This version records the final protocol used for the study. Following additional methodological validation and a corpus-wide consistency audit, the protocol was refined and frozen as v1.3. The final framework classifies binding-substantive values as full, partial or undisclosed provenance according to whether the documentary record identifies an antecedent and makes the relationship to the adopted numerical value reconstructable. Version 3 also fixes the final documentary search boundary, first-order provenance definition, treatment of operative annexes, inherited requirements and external standards, and the final independent reliability procedure. Earlier origin-category and proposition-testing fields are retained as part of the methodological history but are not the basis of the final reported provenance results. This is a deposited methodological protocol and amendment record, not a preregistration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23037692
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Coding protocol: provenance of quantified binding provisions in Trondheim statutory planning instruments

Mahshid Cheraghi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
article

Coding protocol: provenance of quantified binding provisions in Trondheim statutory planning instruments

Mahshid Cheraghi
article en

Abstract

This record documents the study’s coding framework and its amendment history. Earlier versions remain available unchanged so that the development of the protocol can be inspected over time. Version 3 update (September 2026). This version records the final protocol used for the study. Following additional methodological validation and a corpus-wide consistency audit, the protocol was refined and frozen as v1.3. The final framework classifies binding-substantive values as full, partial or undisclosed provenance according to whether the documentary record identifies an antecedent and makes the relationship to the adopted numerical value reconstructable. Version 3 also fixes the final documentary search boundary, first-order provenance definition, treatment of operative annexes, inherited requirements and external standards, and the final independent reliability procedure. Earlier origin-category and proposition-testing fields are retained as part of the methodological history but are not the basis of the final reported provenance results. This is a deposited methodological protocol and amendment record, not a preregistration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Coding protocol: provenance of quantified binding provisions in Trondheim statutory planning instruments — Mahshid Cheraghi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS