Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of an EHR-Integrated Clinical Decision Support Prototype for Pediatric Surgical Site Infection Risk

Objectives To design and evaluate the usability of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support (CDS) prototype supporting pediatric surgical site infection (SSI) risk estimation and preoperative optimization using a multi-phase human-centered design approach. Methods We conducted a three-phase study at a quaternary pediatric academic health system involving clinicians from anesthesia and seven surgical specialties. Phase 1 used contextual inquiry to examine preoperative information gathering, infection risk assessment, and coordination workflows to define user needs. Phase 2 used structured mock-up design review sessions to refine interface design and establish prototype requirements. Phase 3 involved formative usability testing of an interactive prototype using a think-aloud approach, followed by the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. HSUS scores were analyzed descriptively. Results Nine clinicians participated in each phase (10 total participants). Contextual inquiry identified challenges including manual chart review burden, task coordination outside the EHR, and largely qualitative risk assessment practices. Design review translated these needs into a centralized preoperative workspace integrating patient summaries, contextualized SSI risk with contributing factors and benchmarks, and role-based task tracking. During usability testing, clinicians reported reduced chart review burden and better visibility of high-priority information, while identifying opportunities to improve visual prioritization, transparency of risk logic and recommendations, and mechanisms to correct or flag inaccurate content. HSUS results indicated good to excellent usability, with an overall usability score of 80%. Workflow integration received the highest ratings (90%), followed by patient safety and decision effectiveness (86%). Conclusions This study demonstrates that translating predictive models into clinical practice requires integration within real-world workflows, transparent presentation of information, and design aligned with the cognitive and operational realities of perioperative care. These findings provide a foundation for iterative refinement, implementation, and prospective evaluation of EHR-integrated pediatric SSI decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2969-1041
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of an EHR-Integrated Clinical Decision Support Prototype for Pediatric Surgical Site Infection Risk

Carrie T. Chan, Mark J. Pletcher, Karthik Balakrishnan, Jan Yeager et al.
Applied Clinical Informatics
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of an EHR-Integrated Clinical Decision Support Prototype for Pediatric Surgical Site Infection Risk

Carrie T. Chan, Mark J. Pletcher, Karthik Balakrishnan, Jan Yeager, Yulin Hswen, Aaron Scheffler
article en

Abstract

Objectives To design and evaluate the usability of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support (CDS) prototype supporting pediatric surgical site infection (SSI) risk estimation and preoperative optimization using a multi-phase human-centered design approach. Methods We conducted a three-phase study at a quaternary pediatric academic health system involving clinicians from anesthesia and seven surgical specialties. Phase 1 used contextual inquiry to examine preoperative information gathering, infection risk assessment, and coordination workflows to define user needs. Phase 2 used structured mock-up design review sessions to refine interface design and establish prototype requirements. Phase 3 involved formative usability testing of an interactive prototype using a think-aloud approach, followed by the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. HSUS scores were analyzed descriptively. Results Nine clinicians participated in each phase (10 total participants). Contextual inquiry identified challenges including manual chart review burden, task coordination outside the EHR, and largely qualitative risk assessment practices. Design review translated these needs into a centralized preoperative workspace integrating patient summaries, contextualized SSI risk with contributing factors and benchmarks, and role-based task tracking. During usability testing, clinicians reported reduced chart review burden and better visibility of high-priority information, while identifying opportunities to improve visual prioritization, transparency of risk logic and recommendations, and mechanisms to correct or flag inaccurate content. HSUS results indicated good to excellent usability, with an overall usability score of 80%. Workflow integration received the highest ratings (90%), followed by patient safety and decision effectiveness (86%). Conclusions This study demonstrates that translating predictive models into clinical practice requires integration within real-world workflows, transparent presentation of information, and design aligned with the cognitive and operational realities of perioperative care. These findings provide a foundation for iterative refinement, implementation, and prospective evaluation of EHR-integrated pediatric SSI decision support.

Applied Clinical Informatics
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Stanford Health Care (US), Children's Health Council (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.