Club Antarctica? Why a community approach matters for public engagement in gateway cities

Abstract With Antarctica facing many urgent environmental challenges, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure that members of the public are supported to understand, care about and protect the southern polar region. Research to date has taken a variety of approaches to Antarctic public engagement, framing it as a challenge for science communication, the media, education and/or the arts. In this paper, we take a social approach by examining public engagement with Antarctica’s communities, applying theories of place attachment, social capital and structuration. Using the Antarctic gateway city of Hobart as a case example, we ask what Antarctic communities are present in the city, how they are perceived by residents and what factors influence local public engagement with Antarctica. Through in-depth interviews, we identify three separate but overlapping Antarctic communities present in Hobart: the expeditioner community, the gateway community and the diplomatic community. We find that four key factors influence participation in these communities: not only communication, but also built environment and infrastructure, availability of shared activities and the existence of an ‘experience hierarchy’ that prioritizes the perspectives of people who have travelled to Antarctica in person. These results suggest that if we want to move society towards engaging to protect Antarctica, the current engagement focus on science communication may not be sufficient; rather, we should prioritize community-building strategies to strengthen ties between Antarctic communities and the broader public.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antarctic Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102026100844
Primary Topic
Polar Research and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Club Antarctica? Why a community approach matters for public engagement in gateway cities

Katie Marx, Karen A. Alexander, Elizabeth Leane, Hanne Nielsen
Antarctic Science
Polar Research and Ecology
article

Club Antarctica? Why a community approach matters for public engagement in gateway cities

Katie Marx, Karen A. Alexander, Elizabeth Leane, Hanne Nielsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract With Antarctica facing many urgent environmental challenges, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure that members of the public are supported to understand, care about and protect the southern polar region. Research to date has taken a variety of approaches to Antarctic public engagement, framing it as a challenge for science communication, the media, education and/or the arts. In this paper, we take a social approach by examining public engagement with Antarctica’s communities, applying theories of place attachment, social capital and structuration. Using the Antarctic gateway city of Hobart as a case example, we ask what Antarctic communities are present in the city, how they are perceived by residents and what factors influence local public engagement with Antarctica. Through in-depth interviews, we identify three separate but overlapping Antarctic communities present in Hobart: the expeditioner community, the gateway community and the diplomatic community. We find that four key factors influence participation in these communities: not only communication, but also built environment and infrastructure, availability of shared activities and the existence of an ‘experience hierarchy’ that prioritizes the perspectives of people who have travelled to Antarctica in person. These results suggest that if we want to move society towards engaging to protect Antarctica, the current engagement focus on science communication may not be sufficient; rather, we should prioritize community-building strategies to strengthen ties between Antarctic communities and the broader public.

Antarctic Science
University of Tasmania (AU), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Polar Research and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Club Antarctica? Why a community approach matters for public engagement in gateway cities — Katie Marx, Karen A. Alexander, et al. · Antarctic Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS