Empathy and Theory of Mind Abilities Among Help-Seeking Adolescents with Different Cyberbullying Roles

Objective This study aimed to examine empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities among adolescents involved in cyberbullying and to identify the risk factors associated with different involvement roles. Methods A total of 244 adolescents were categorized into four groups based on the Revised Cyberbullying Inventory-II: cyberbully-victims (CBV, n = 110), pure cybervictims (CV, n = 53), pure cyberbullies (CB, n = 20), and non-involved controls (C, n = 61). ToM was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and the Hinting Test (HT), while empathy was measured with the KA-SI Empathic Tendency Scale. Clinical evaluations were conducted using the K-SADS-5. Results The CBV group showed significantly lower HT and affective empathy scores, along with higher rates of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed in RMET scores between groups. Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher affective empathy and HT scores reduced the risk of cyberbullying involvement, whereas an MDD diagnosis was a significant risk factor for both CBV and CB groups. Conclusions Understanding distinct profiles regarding ToM and empathy may inform targeted prevention and intervention strategies against cyberbullying. Additionally, integrating mental health assessments may further enhance the effectiveness of existing programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045261494398
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Empathy and Theory of Mind Abilities Among Help-Seeking Adolescents with Different Cyberbullying Roles

Nazan Gundogan, Sevay Alşen Güney, Ekin Süt, Berkin Akbaydar et al.
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Empathy and Theory of Mind Abilities Among Help-Seeking Adolescents with Different Cyberbullying Roles

Nazan Gundogan, Sevay Alşen Güney, Ekin Süt, Berkin Akbaydar, Buket Belendir Esen, Gizem Keser
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine empathy and Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities among adolescents involved in cyberbullying and to identify the risk factors associated with different involvement roles. Methods A total of 244 adolescents were categorized into four groups based on the Revised Cyberbullying Inventory-II: cyberbully-victims (CBV, n = 110), pure cybervictims (CV, n = 53), pure cyberbullies (CB, n = 20), and non-involved controls (C, n = 61). ToM was assessed using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and the Hinting Test (HT), while empathy was measured with the KA-SI Empathic Tendency Scale. Clinical evaluations were conducted using the K-SADS-5. Results The CBV group showed significantly lower HT and affective empathy scores, along with higher rates of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed in RMET scores between groups. Logistic regression analyses indicated that higher affective empathy and HT scores reduced the risk of cyberbullying involvement, whereas an MDD diagnosis was a significant risk factor for both CBV and CB groups. Conclusions Understanding distinct profiles regarding ToM and empathy may inform targeted prevention and intervention strategies against cyberbullying. Additionally, integrating mental health assessments may further enhance the effectiveness of existing programs.

Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR), American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (US), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Elazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.