Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE To prospectively determine the false-negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS Patients with cT4 and/or cN2/N3 breast cancer with a nodal complete response (cN0) after NAC were eligible. SLNB was performed with dual-tracer mapping; nodal clipping was not required. All patients had a completion axillary lymph node dissection. FNR calculations were based on the patients with adequate mapping (ie, ≥3 SLNs or <3 SLNs plus clipped node). Of the planned 150 patients, we anticipated that 84 patients would have adequate mapping and that 47 would have residual disease after NAC (nodal pathologic complete response [pCR] rate: 45%). Assuming a true FNR of 10%, we estimated that this sample size would allow estimation of FNR within a margin of error (95% CI half-width) of ±8.6%. RESULTS From August 2017 to December 2025, 456 patients were screened for eligibility; 369 (81%) became cN0 after NAC and 145 were enrolled in the study. Of these, 44% of patients had inflammatory breast cancer (cT4d), 23% had other cT4 disease, 12% had cN2 disease, and 21% had cN3 disease. At least 1 SLN was identified in 108 patients (74%), of whom 87 had either ≥3 SLNs (n = 82) or 1-2 SLNs with a clipped node retrieved (n = 5). Of 87 patients with adequate mapping, the nodal pCR rate was 46%; of 47 (54%) with residual nodal disease, one false-negative SLN was observed, yielding an SLN FNR of 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1 to 12.7). CONCLUSION In a prospective cohort of patients with LABC, the SLN identification rate was 74% and the FNR was 2.1%, suggesting that SLNB may be an appropriate method to stage the axilla in LABC after downstaging with NAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-26-01114
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Virgilio Sacchini, Starr Koslow Mautner, Laurie J. Kirstein, Giacomo Montagna et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Virgilio Sacchini, Starr Koslow Mautner, Laurie J. Kirstein, Giacomo Montagna, Deborah M. Capko, Alexandra Simkovich Heerdt, Andrea Veronica Barrio, Marcia Edelweiss, Audree B. Tadros, Daniel Xavier Choi, Alison C. Pellecchia, Stephanie Downs‐Canner, Varadan Sevilimedu, Anita Mamtani, Monica Morrow, George Plitas, Mahmoud Bahij El-Tamer, Tracy-Ann S. Moo, Gladys L. Giron, Cristina Lopez-Penalver, Minna K. Lee, Elizabeth Cooney
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE To prospectively determine the false-negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS Patients with cT4 and/or cN2/N3 breast cancer with a nodal complete response (cN0) after NAC were eligible. SLNB was performed with dual-tracer mapping; nodal clipping was not required. All patients had a completion axillary lymph node dissection. FNR calculations were based on the patients with adequate mapping (ie, ≥3 SLNs or <3 SLNs plus clipped node). Of the planned 150 patients, we anticipated that 84 patients would have adequate mapping and that 47 would have residual disease after NAC (nodal pathologic complete response [pCR] rate: 45%). Assuming a true FNR of 10%, we estimated that this sample size would allow estimation of FNR within a margin of error (95% CI half-width) of ±8.6%. RESULTS From August 2017 to December 2025, 456 patients were screened for eligibility; 369 (81%) became cN0 after NAC and 145 were enrolled in the study. Of these, 44% of patients had inflammatory breast cancer (cT4d), 23% had other cT4 disease, 12% had cN2 disease, and 21% had cN3 disease. At least 1 SLN was identified in 108 patients (74%), of whom 87 had either ≥3 SLNs (n = 82) or 1-2 SLNs with a clipped node retrieved (n = 5). Of 87 patients with adequate mapping, the nodal pCR rate was 46%; of 47 (54%) with residual nodal disease, one false-negative SLN was observed, yielding an SLN FNR of 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1 to 12.7). CONCLUSION In a prospective cohort of patients with LABC, the SLN identification rate was 74% and the FNR was 2.1%, suggesting that SLNB may be an appropriate method to stage the axilla in LABC after downstaging with NAC.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Baptist Hospital of Miami (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Baptist Health South Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.