Why do Farmers Grow Diversity? Reaching Beyond Own-Consumption and Agricultural Income to Support Food Security and Nutrition

Background: Having diverse crops and animals on small farms is broadly seen as a way to support both farmer nutrition and environmental resilience. However, studies often find only a weak statistical relationship between the diversity produced and the diversity consumed. Understanding why smallholder farmers produce diversity is central both for operationalizing agriculture-nutrition linkages and for supporting resilient agro-ecosystems. Objective: This study examines farmers’ own reasons for producing diversity and explores how these reasons shape the production-diet relationship. Methods: As part of a mixed methods, participatory action research program in highland Ecuador, a community researcher conducted activity-based interviews with Indigenous and mestizo/a farmers ( n = 26); interviews were analyzed using cognitive mapping and cultural domain analysis. Results: On average, farmers cultivated 49 different edible plants and five types of livestock, but they regularly consumed only about half of them. Products were consumed “rarely or never” because of availability limitations, preparation difficulty, taste, or because they were mainly used for other purposes. Farmers grew diverse edible plants for many reasons beyond consumption, including economic (88% of participants), socio-affective (85%), agronomic (50%), and health-and-safety (31%) motives. Conclusions: The findings help explain why statistical associations between production and diet are often small. The importance of social and emotional (affective) values in informing farmers’ production decisions adds a critical, yet underexplored, dimension to a literature that otherwise centers the assumption that farmers mostly make their decisions based on instrumental, cause-and-effect pathways. Lessons provide insights to better align programming with farmers’ endogenous decision-making rationale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721261484355
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Why do Farmers Grow Diversity? Reaching Beyond Own-Consumption and Agricultural Income to Support Food Security and Nutrition

Ana Laura Deaconu, Malek Batal, Mylène Riva, Eduar Pinzón Cano
Food and Nutrition Bulletin
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Why do Farmers Grow Diversity? Reaching Beyond Own-Consumption and Agricultural Income to Support Food Security and Nutrition

Ana Laura Deaconu, Malek Batal, Mylène Riva, Eduar Pinzón Cano
article en

Abstract

Background: Having diverse crops and animals on small farms is broadly seen as a way to support both farmer nutrition and environmental resilience. However, studies often find only a weak statistical relationship between the diversity produced and the diversity consumed. Understanding why smallholder farmers produce diversity is central both for operationalizing agriculture-nutrition linkages and for supporting resilient agro-ecosystems. Objective: This study examines farmers’ own reasons for producing diversity and explores how these reasons shape the production-diet relationship. Methods: As part of a mixed methods, participatory action research program in highland Ecuador, a community researcher conducted activity-based interviews with Indigenous and mestizo/a farmers ( n = 26); interviews were analyzed using cognitive mapping and cultural domain analysis. Results: On average, farmers cultivated 49 different edible plants and five types of livestock, but they regularly consumed only about half of them. Products were consumed “rarely or never” because of availability limitations, preparation difficulty, taste, or because they were mainly used for other purposes. Farmers grew diverse edible plants for many reasons beyond consumption, including economic (88% of participants), socio-affective (85%), agronomic (50%), and health-and-safety (31%) motives. Conclusions: The findings help explain why statistical associations between production and diet are often small. The importance of social and emotional (affective) values in informing farmers’ production decisions adds a critical, yet underexplored, dimension to a literature that otherwise centers the assumption that farmers mostly make their decisions based on instrumental, cause-and-effect pathways. Lessons provide insights to better align programming with farmers’ endogenous decision-making rationale.

Food and Nutrition Bulletin
McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.