BURDEN AMONG CAREGIVERS OF PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS IN DIALYSIS CENTRES FUNCTIONING UNDER A HUB-AND-SPOKE MODEL: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Background: Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) imposes a considerable psychosocial and economic burden not only on patients but also on the family members who care for them. Government-supported dialysis programmes delivered through a hub-and-spoke public–private partnership model have expanded access to dialysis close to patients' homes, but the burden experienced by caregivers within this delivery model has not been well characterised. Objective: To assess the level of burden among caregivers of patients undergoing MHD at government-supported centres functioning under a hub-and-spoke model, and to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with caregiver burden. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 698 caregivers attending peripheral dialysis centres linked to a hub hospital were enrolled. Caregiver burden was assessed using the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), categorised as little-or-no (0–22), mild-to-moderate (23–44), moderate-to-severe (45–66), and severe (67–88) burden. Sociodemographic and clinical variables of both patients and caregivers were recorded and tested for association with burden category using the chi-square test, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Of 698 caregivers, 419 (60.0%) were male and 279 (40.0%) female; 61.2% were spouses of the patient. Moderate-to-severe or severe burden was present in 377 caregivers (54.0%). Caregiver burden showed a statistically significant association with dialysis vintage (p<0.001), with the proportion of moderate-to-severe/severe burden rising from 26.2% in caregivers of patients on dialysis for under 1 year to 80.4% in those on dialysis for more than 3 years. A significant association was also observed with caregiver gender (p=0.016), female caregivers reporting greater burden than male caregivers. No significant association was found with caregiver age, relationship to the patient, or household income (p>0.05). Conclusion: Roughly one in two caregivers of patients on MHD at hub-and-spoke dialysis centres experienced moderate-to-severe burden, closely tracking dialysis vintage and caregiver sex. These observations suggest that caregiver-directed psychosocial and financial support should be considered an integral, longitudinally-scaled component of chronic dialysis care programmes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23033627
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

BURDEN AMONG CAREGIVERS OF PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS IN DIALYSIS CENTRES FUNCTIONING UNDER A HUB-AND-SPOKE MODEL: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Anoop Mehta*1, Manjusha Yadla2, Srinivas P.3
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

BURDEN AMONG CAREGIVERS OF PATIENTS RECEIVING MAINTENANCE HEMODIALYSIS IN DIALYSIS CENTRES FUNCTIONING UNDER A HUB-AND-SPOKE MODEL: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Anoop Mehta*1, Manjusha Yadla2, Srinivas P.3
article en

Abstract

Background: Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) imposes a considerable psychosocial and economic burden not only on patients but also on the family members who care for them. Government-supported dialysis programmes delivered through a hub-and-spoke public–private partnership model have expanded access to dialysis close to patients' homes, but the burden experienced by caregivers within this delivery model has not been well characterised. Objective: To assess the level of burden among caregivers of patients undergoing MHD at government-supported centres functioning under a hub-and-spoke model, and to identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with caregiver burden. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 698 caregivers attending peripheral dialysis centres linked to a hub hospital were enrolled. Caregiver burden was assessed using the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), categorised as little-or-no (0–22), mild-to-moderate (23–44), moderate-to-severe (45–66), and severe (67–88) burden. Sociodemographic and clinical variables of both patients and caregivers were recorded and tested for association with burden category using the chi-square test, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: Of 698 caregivers, 419 (60.0%) were male and 279 (40.0%) female; 61.2% were spouses of the patient. Moderate-to-severe or severe burden was present in 377 caregivers (54.0%). Caregiver burden showed a statistically significant association with dialysis vintage (p<0.001), with the proportion of moderate-to-severe/severe burden rising from 26.2% in caregivers of patients on dialysis for under 1 year to 80.4% in those on dialysis for more than 3 years. A significant association was also observed with caregiver gender (p=0.016), female caregivers reporting greater burden than male caregivers. No significant association was found with caregiver age, relationship to the patient, or household income (p>0.05). Conclusion: Roughly one in two caregivers of patients on MHD at hub-and-spoke dialysis centres experienced moderate-to-severe burden, closely tracking dialysis vintage and caregiver sex. These observations suggest that caregiver-directed psychosocial and financial support should be considered an integral, longitudinally-scaled component of chronic dialysis care programmes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.