Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer

Abstract Internal evolutionary conflicts arise when elements within an organism have diverging fitness interests. Examples range from meiotic drive and cytoplasmic male sterility to transposable elements and supernumerary B chromosomes. While once treated as genetic curiosities, they are now seen as widespread and major drivers of eukaryotic genome evolution. Yet their study remains fragmented, with no clear entry point not only for those who wish to gain an overview of theoretical advances, or those who wish to construct models of their own. Here, we discuss ways in which internal evolutionary conflicts have been modelled and develop a common population genetic framework for building such models. The framework provides explicit criteria for what counts as conflict, distinguishing it from fitness trade-offs, and formalises how and when internal conflicts arise. By treating different cases within the same structure, it shows that these diverse phenomena share a common logic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voag092
Primary Topic
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer

Ananda Shikhara Bhat, Gaurav S. Athreya, Thomas A. Keaney, E. Yagmur Erten et al.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
article

Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer

Ananda Shikhara Bhat, Gaurav S. Athreya, Thomas A. Keaney, E. Yagmur Erten, J. Arvid Ågren
article en

Abstract

Abstract Internal evolutionary conflicts arise when elements within an organism have diverging fitness interests. Examples range from meiotic drive and cytoplasmic male sterility to transposable elements and supernumerary B chromosomes. While once treated as genetic curiosities, they are now seen as widespread and major drivers of eukaryotic genome evolution. Yet their study remains fragmented, with no clear entry point not only for those who wish to gain an overview of theoretical advances, or those who wish to construct models of their own. Here, we discuss ways in which internal evolutionary conflicts have been modelled and develop a common population genetic framework for building such models. The framework provides explicit criteria for what counts as conflict, distinguishing it from fitness trade-offs, and formalises how and when internal conflicts arise. By treating different cases within the same structure, it shows that these diverse phenomena share a common logic.

Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Groningen (NL), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Internal evolutionary conflicts: a conceptual synthesis and mathematical primer — Ananda Shikhara Bhat, Gaurav S. Athreya, et al. · Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS