Wall and packing shear stresses and turbulence effect with steam methane reforming

Abstract Turbulence distorts the flow and disturbs the transport processes within a packed bed. A statistical comparison of the results from three hundred and sixty simulations of steam methane reforming (SMR) employing 30 different pressure drop correlations, three different inlet pressures, and two inlet temperatures with a cross sectionally averaged turbulence‐free model and a cross sectionally averaged Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence model under industrial operating conditions indicates that turbulence reduces methane conversion and hydrogen yield. The knowledge of the wall shear stress is important in many engineering practices. A relation for computing the wall shear stress in packed beds directly from the bulk flow data for both the turbulence and turbulence‐free models is presented and the axial distribution of the wall shear stress and also the mean packing shear stress are reported for steam methane reforming. Unlike the logarithmic law of the wall, the wall shear stress relation presented here is directly derived from the averaging of the Navier–Stokes momentum equation without any reference to the flow other than the no slip condition in the near‐wall boundary layer. The statistical analysis of the wall shear stress shows that turbulence exerts no influence on the wall shear stress.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.70585
Primary Topic
Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Wall and packing shear stresses and turbulence effect with steam methane reforming

Masood Otarod
The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
article

Wall and packing shear stresses and turbulence effect with steam methane reforming

Masood Otarod
article en

Abstract

Abstract Turbulence distorts the flow and disturbs the transport processes within a packed bed. A statistical comparison of the results from three hundred and sixty simulations of steam methane reforming (SMR) employing 30 different pressure drop correlations, three different inlet pressures, and two inlet temperatures with a cross sectionally averaged turbulence‐free model and a cross sectionally averaged Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence model under industrial operating conditions indicates that turbulence reduces methane conversion and hydrogen yield. The knowledge of the wall shear stress is important in many engineering practices. A relation for computing the wall shear stress in packed beds directly from the bulk flow data for both the turbulence and turbulence‐free models is presented and the axial distribution of the wall shear stress and also the mean packing shear stress are reported for steam methane reforming. Unlike the logarithmic law of the wall, the wall shear stress relation presented here is directly derived from the averaging of the Navier–Stokes momentum equation without any reference to the flow other than the no slip condition in the near‐wall boundary layer. The statistical analysis of the wall shear stress shows that turbulence exerts no influence on the wall shear stress.

The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
University of Scranton (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wall and packing shear stresses and turbulence effect with steam methane reforming — Masood Otarod · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS