Leadership models for fostering sustainable innovation: a conceptual framework for strategic integration across UN sustainable development goals

Purpose This article examines how different leadership architectures enable organizations to systematically pursue sustainable innovation in the context of accelerating digital disruption, climate imperatives and increasing stakeholder demands for environmental, social and governance accountability. Building on a multi-theoretic foundation, the study advances a unified conceptual framework that addresses the theoretical fragmentation characterizing extant leadership-sustainability scholarship. Design/methodology/approach A systematic conceptual synthesis approach (Torraco, 2016; Jaakkola, 2020) was adopted to develop a multi-model framework integrating six leadership models. The framework draws on Upper Echelons Theory, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Learning Theory. Literature was selected from association of business schools (ABS)-ranked management, leadership and sustainability journals published between 1977 and 2025. Findings The article advances five theoretically grounded research propositions demonstrating that different leadership styles perform distinct yet complementary roles in fostering sustainable innovation. The framework reveals how leadership influences organizational adaptability, innovation capability and stakeholder engagement, enhancing sustainability outcomes aligned with sustainable development goals (SDGs) 8, 9, 12 and 17. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual study, the framework requires empirical validation across diverse organizational and national contexts. Future research should employ cross-national comparisons, longitudinal designs, mixed-methods approaches and multi-level structural equation modeling to test and refine the proposed relationships. Practical implications The study provides actionable insights for managers and policymakers by identifying leadership configurations that bridge the gap between sustainability ambitions and innovation execution. The Leadership Capability Audit framework and Leadership-SDG Alignment Matrix offer concrete diagnostic tools for organizations at different stages of sustainability maturity. Social implications By aligning leadership-driven innovation with the UN 2030 Agenda, the framework contributes to broader societal goals in advancing inclusive economic growth, responsible production, climate adaptation and collaborative partnerships for sustainable development. Originality/value Three original contributions are made: (1) the first framework to explicitly map six leadership models to specific UN SDGs, (2) introduction of contextual integration as a novel moderating construct linking leadership behavior to sustainable innovation outcomes and (3) five empirically testable propositions providing a structured research agenda addressing the fragmentation identified by Voegtlin et al. (2012) and Metcalf and Benn (2013).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Business
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajb-04-2026-0067
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Leadership models for fostering sustainable innovation: a conceptual framework for strategic integration across UN sustainable development goals

Yussif Mohammed Alhassan, Stephen Tetteh, Mohammed Bawah
American Journal of Business
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Leadership models for fostering sustainable innovation: a conceptual framework for strategic integration across UN sustainable development goals

Yussif Mohammed Alhassan, Stephen Tetteh, Mohammed Bawah
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article examines how different leadership architectures enable organizations to systematically pursue sustainable innovation in the context of accelerating digital disruption, climate imperatives and increasing stakeholder demands for environmental, social and governance accountability. Building on a multi-theoretic foundation, the study advances a unified conceptual framework that addresses the theoretical fragmentation characterizing extant leadership-sustainability scholarship. Design/methodology/approach A systematic conceptual synthesis approach (Torraco, 2016; Jaakkola, 2020) was adopted to develop a multi-model framework integrating six leadership models. The framework draws on Upper Echelons Theory, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Learning Theory. Literature was selected from association of business schools (ABS)-ranked management, leadership and sustainability journals published between 1977 and 2025. Findings The article advances five theoretically grounded research propositions demonstrating that different leadership styles perform distinct yet complementary roles in fostering sustainable innovation. The framework reveals how leadership influences organizational adaptability, innovation capability and stakeholder engagement, enhancing sustainability outcomes aligned with sustainable development goals (SDGs) 8, 9, 12 and 17. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual study, the framework requires empirical validation across diverse organizational and national contexts. Future research should employ cross-national comparisons, longitudinal designs, mixed-methods approaches and multi-level structural equation modeling to test and refine the proposed relationships. Practical implications The study provides actionable insights for managers and policymakers by identifying leadership configurations that bridge the gap between sustainability ambitions and innovation execution. The Leadership Capability Audit framework and Leadership-SDG Alignment Matrix offer concrete diagnostic tools for organizations at different stages of sustainability maturity. Social implications By aligning leadership-driven innovation with the UN 2030 Agenda, the framework contributes to broader societal goals in advancing inclusive economic growth, responsible production, climate adaptation and collaborative partnerships for sustainable development. Originality/value Three original contributions are made: (1) the first framework to explicitly map six leadership models to specific UN SDGs, (2) introduction of contextual integration as a novel moderating construct linking leadership behavior to sustainable innovation outcomes and (3) five empirically testable propositions providing a structured research agenda addressing the fragmentation identified by Voegtlin et al. (2012) and Metcalf and Benn (2013).

American Journal of Business
University for Development Studies (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.