Deep learning–based BMD estimation from knee radiographs with conformal uncertainty quantification

Background Population-wide osteoporosis screening is hindered by limited access to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Opportunistic screening using plain radiographs is a promising alternative, but safe clinical adoption requires models that can reliably quantify their uncertainty. We evaluated a deep learning model that estimates femoral-neck bone mineral density (BMD) from knee radiographs and employs conformal prediction to provide calibrated, patient-specific uncertainty intervals. Methods We utilized bilateral knee radiographs with paired femoral-neck DXA scans (within 180 days) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. The dataset was split at the participant level into training (70%), validation (10%), test (10%), and calibration (10%) sets. An EfficientNet-V2-M model was trained to predict BMD. We implemented Split Conformal Prediction with two test-time augmentation (TTA) strategies: (1) averaging augmented predictions before conformalization (Standard TTA), and (2) treating each augmented view as a separate sample (Multisample TTA). Performance was evaluated using Pearson correlation ( r ), mean absolute error (MAE), and empirical coverage of 90%, 95%, and 99% prediction intervals. Results The model achieved a Pearson correlation of r = 0.6800 and MAE of 0.1107 g/cm 2 with standard TTA. Conformal prediction successfully produced valid uncertainty intervals, with empirical coverage matching nominal levels (e.g., ∼95% coverage for 95% intervals). Multisample TTA yielded slightly narrower 95% intervals for the bilateral model (0.2776 vs. 0.2792 g/cm 2 ) without sacrificing coverage. Crucially, interval widths correlated with prediction errors, indicating the model correctly signaled higher uncertainty for difficult cases. Conclusion Deep learning can extract BMD signals from knee radiographs, and conformal prediction provides a rigorous “safety wrapper” by quantifying uncertainty. This approach offers a foundational step towards trustworthy opportunistic osteoporosis screening in orthopedic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917261451436
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Deep learning–based BMD estimation from knee radiographs with conformal uncertainty quantification

WaiLok Charlix Yeung, Long Hui
Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Deep learning–based BMD estimation from knee radiographs with conformal uncertainty quantification

WaiLok Charlix Yeung, Long Hui
article en

Abstract

Background Population-wide osteoporosis screening is hindered by limited access to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Opportunistic screening using plain radiographs is a promising alternative, but safe clinical adoption requires models that can reliably quantify their uncertainty. We evaluated a deep learning model that estimates femoral-neck bone mineral density (BMD) from knee radiographs and employs conformal prediction to provide calibrated, patient-specific uncertainty intervals. Methods We utilized bilateral knee radiographs with paired femoral-neck DXA scans (within 180 days) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. The dataset was split at the participant level into training (70%), validation (10%), test (10%), and calibration (10%) sets. An EfficientNet-V2-M model was trained to predict BMD. We implemented Split Conformal Prediction with two test-time augmentation (TTA) strategies: (1) averaging augmented predictions before conformalization (Standard TTA), and (2) treating each augmented view as a separate sample (Multisample TTA). Performance was evaluated using Pearson correlation ( r ), mean absolute error (MAE), and empirical coverage of 90%, 95%, and 99% prediction intervals. Results The model achieved a Pearson correlation of r = 0.6800 and MAE of 0.1107 g/cm 2 with standard TTA. Conformal prediction successfully produced valid uncertainty intervals, with empirical coverage matching nominal levels (e.g., ∼95% coverage for 95% intervals). Multisample TTA yielded slightly narrower 95% intervals for the bilateral model (0.2776 vs. 0.2792 g/cm 2 ) without sacrificing coverage. Crucially, interval widths correlated with prediction errors, indicating the model correctly signaled higher uncertainty for difficult cases. Conclusion Deep learning can extract BMD signals from knee radiographs, and conformal prediction provides a rigorous “safety wrapper” by quantifying uncertainty. This approach offers a foundational step towards trustworthy opportunistic osteoporosis screening in orthopedic settings.

Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), Princess Margaret Hospital (NZ), Princess Margaret Hospital (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.