Biomarkers in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis-AssociatedInterstitial Lung Disease: A Scoping Review

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an increasingly recognized manifestation of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The marked biological and clinical heterogeneity of AAV-associated ILD (AAV-ILD) poses major challenges for diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. Circulating biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for improving disease characterization; however, the available evidence remains limited and fragmented. Methods: We performed a scoping review to summarize the current evidence on circulating biomarkers investigated in AAV-ILD. Peer-reviewed studies evaluating biomarkers associated with ILD occurrence, disease activity, radiological progression, pulmonary function decline, mortality, or treatment response were systematically identified and qualitatively analyzed. Results: Seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The identified biomarkers could be broadly classified into three biological categories: epithelial injury biomarkers (KL-6 and SP-D), immune–fibrotic biomarkers (CCL2, CXCL6, CXCL13, and IL-13), and epithelial remodelling biomarkers (CA19-9, CA125, and CYFRA21-1). KL-6 and SP-D were associated across individual studies with pulmonary involvement, disease activity, or relapse, whereas CCL2, CXCL6, CXCL13, and IL-13 were associated with inflammatory and profibrotic processes, radiological abnormalities, or disease progression. Tumour-associated biomarkers were associated with radiological abnormalities and mortality, suggesting that they may reflect aberrant epithelial remodelling rather than malignancy. Across studies, circulating biomarkers showed preliminary associations with disease detection, prognosis, longitudinal disease behaviour, and treatment response; however, their clinical utility has not been prospectively established. Overall, the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, retrospective study designs, and substantial clinical heterogeneity. Conclusions: Circulating biomarkers represent a promising approach for improving the biological characterization of AAV-ILD and may contribute to the future characterization of inflammatory and fibrotic disease phenotypes. Prospective multicentre studies with independent validation cohorts are required before biomarker-guided management can be implemented in routine clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14102202
Primary Topic
Vasculitis and related conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Biomarkers in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis-AssociatedInterstitial Lung Disease: A Scoping Review

Paolo Cameli, Martina Meocci, Nazia Chaudhuri, Laura Bergantini et al.
Biomedicines
Vasculitis and related conditions
article

Biomarkers in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis-AssociatedInterstitial Lung Disease: A Scoping Review

Paolo Cameli, Martina Meocci, Nazia Chaudhuri, Laura Bergantini, Tommaso Pianigiani, Elena Bargagli, Edoardo Conticini, Samantha Banford, Silvia Grazzini, Akter Dilroba, Ashley Elliott, Michael McConville
article en

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an increasingly recognized manifestation of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The marked biological and clinical heterogeneity of AAV-associated ILD (AAV-ILD) poses major challenges for diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. Circulating biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for improving disease characterization; however, the available evidence remains limited and fragmented. Methods: We performed a scoping review to summarize the current evidence on circulating biomarkers investigated in AAV-ILD. Peer-reviewed studies evaluating biomarkers associated with ILD occurrence, disease activity, radiological progression, pulmonary function decline, mortality, or treatment response were systematically identified and qualitatively analyzed. Results: Seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The identified biomarkers could be broadly classified into three biological categories: epithelial injury biomarkers (KL-6 and SP-D), immune–fibrotic biomarkers (CCL2, CXCL6, CXCL13, and IL-13), and epithelial remodelling biomarkers (CA19-9, CA125, and CYFRA21-1). KL-6 and SP-D were associated across individual studies with pulmonary involvement, disease activity, or relapse, whereas CCL2, CXCL6, CXCL13, and IL-13 were associated with inflammatory and profibrotic processes, radiological abnormalities, or disease progression. Tumour-associated biomarkers were associated with radiological abnormalities and mortality, suggesting that they may reflect aberrant epithelial remodelling rather than malignancy. Across studies, circulating biomarkers showed preliminary associations with disease detection, prognosis, longitudinal disease behaviour, and treatment response; however, their clinical utility has not been prospectively established. Overall, the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, retrospective study designs, and substantial clinical heterogeneity. Conclusions: Circulating biomarkers represent a promising approach for improving the biological characterization of AAV-ILD and may contribute to the future characterization of inflammatory and fibrotic disease phenotypes. Prospective multicentre studies with independent validation cohorts are required before biomarker-guided management can be implemented in routine clinical practice.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(10)
University of Siena (IT), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (GB), University of Ulster (GB), Altnagelvin Area Hospital (GB), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vasculitis and related conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.