Evaluating the Relationship Between Hospital Price Markup and Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To evaluate the association between hospital price markup and perioperative and long-term outcomes following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of Background Data. Hospital price markup, defined as the ratio of billed charges to actual costs, varies widely across U.S. institutions and is largely unregulated. While prior studies in general surgery have linked high-markup hospitals to poorer outcomes, this relationship has not been characterized in cervical spine surgery. Methods. Adult patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Hospital-level charge-to-cost ratios were calculated using ACDF encounters, and hospitals in the highest regional markup decile were designated as high-markup hospitals (HMH). Outcomes included perioperative complications, 30-day readmission, long-term complications, and reoperation. Multivariable regression models adjusted for patient-, procedural-, and hospital-level covariates. Results. A total of 241,965 patients were included; 22,495 (9.3%) were treated at HMH. Mean markup was significantly higher at HMH versus non-HMH (7.81x vs. 4.10x, P <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, HMH were associated with higher 30-day readmission (2.94% vs. 2.63%, P =0.007), perioperative complications (2.61% vs. 2.36%, P =0.020), long-term complications (6.99% vs. 6.58%, P =0.021), and reoperation (4.07% vs. 3.75%, P =0.020). Conclusion. Among patients undergoing elective ACDF, treatment at high-markup hospitals was independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes despite greater expenditure. These findings challenge the assumption that higher-cost care confers higher quality and have important implications for spine surgery healthcare policy. Level of Evidence. III

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005890
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating the Relationship Between Hospital Price Markup and Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Srikanth N. Divi, Mark A. Plantz, Austin R Chen, Tyler M. Compton et al.
Spine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Evaluating the Relationship Between Hospital Price Markup and Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Srikanth N. Divi, Mark A. Plantz, Austin R Chen, Tyler M. Compton, Anoop Sunkara, Wellington K. Hsu, Alpesh A. Patel, Theodore A. Joaquin, Cade F. Bennett, Jacob W. McDevitt, Matthew Colman, Andre C. Ferreria
article en

Abstract

Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To evaluate the association between hospital price markup and perioperative and long-term outcomes following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of Background Data. Hospital price markup, defined as the ratio of billed charges to actual costs, varies widely across U.S. institutions and is largely unregulated. While prior studies in general surgery have linked high-markup hospitals to poorer outcomes, this relationship has not been characterized in cervical spine surgery. Methods. Adult patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2016 to 2022 were identified from the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Hospital-level charge-to-cost ratios were calculated using ACDF encounters, and hospitals in the highest regional markup decile were designated as high-markup hospitals (HMH). Outcomes included perioperative complications, 30-day readmission, long-term complications, and reoperation. Multivariable regression models adjusted for patient-, procedural-, and hospital-level covariates. Results. A total of 241,965 patients were included; 22,495 (9.3%) were treated at HMH. Mean markup was significantly higher at HMH versus non-HMH (7.81x vs. 4.10x, P <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, HMH were associated with higher 30-day readmission (2.94% vs. 2.63%, P =0.007), perioperative complications (2.61% vs. 2.36%, P =0.020), long-term complications (6.99% vs. 6.58%, P =0.021), and reoperation (4.07% vs. 3.75%, P =0.020). Conclusion. Among patients undergoing elective ACDF, treatment at high-markup hospitals was independently associated with worse postoperative outcomes despite greater expenditure. These findings challenge the assumption that higher-cost care confers higher quality and have important implications for spine surgery healthcare policy. Level of Evidence. III

Spine
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.