Multi-Objective Comparative Analysis of High-Strength Steel–Concrete Composite Columns

Steel–concrete composite tubular columns have become increasingly attractive for sustainable structural applications due to their high load-carrying capacity and efficient material utilization. However, optimizing their structural performance while simultaneously minimizing embodied carbon emissions and material cost remains a challenging multi-objective problem. This study presents a comprehensive optimization framework for circular, rectangular, and square composite tubular columns composed of high-strength materials, and using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithms. The multi-objective optimization simultaneously maximizes axial load capacity while minimizing embodied CO2 emissions, considering both sections with (WR) and without (WoR) additional longitudinal reinforcement, enabling the identification of optimal trade-offs between structural performance and environmental impact. Design variables include the cross-sectional dimensions, concrete compressive strength, steel yield strength, and reinforcement configuration. The resulting Pareto-optimal solutions are further evaluated using a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on Minkowski Metrics combined with Entropy Theory to identify the best overall compromise solution. The numerical results demonstrate that the use of high-strength materials can reduce embodied CO2 emissions by up to 16% in the analyzed cases. The implemented load-bearing capacity formulation was also validated against experimental results, yielding a mean Nexp/NNBR16239 ratio of 1.01 for the six specimens analyzed. The multi-objective formulation associated with Minkowski metrics produces a robust tool for determining the best solutions in general, as well as the best solutions related to the maximum load that the columns can support. Finally, for both the single-objective and multi-objective problem analyses, increasing the slenderness of the columns resulted in more costly solutions, both economically and environmentally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10100517
Primary Topic
Topology Optimization in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi-Objective Comparative Analysis of High-Strength Steel–Concrete Composite Columns

Moacir Kripka, Jéssica Salomão Lourenção, Víctor Yepes, Élcio Cassimiro Alves
Journal of Composites Science
Topology Optimization in Engineering
article

Multi-Objective Comparative Analysis of High-Strength Steel–Concrete Composite Columns

Moacir Kripka, Jéssica Salomão Lourenção, Víctor Yepes, Élcio Cassimiro Alves
article en

Abstract

Steel–concrete composite tubular columns have become increasingly attractive for sustainable structural applications due to their high load-carrying capacity and efficient material utilization. However, optimizing their structural performance while simultaneously minimizing embodied carbon emissions and material cost remains a challenging multi-objective problem. This study presents a comprehensive optimization framework for circular, rectangular, and square composite tubular columns composed of high-strength materials, and using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithms. The multi-objective optimization simultaneously maximizes axial load capacity while minimizing embodied CO2 emissions, considering both sections with (WR) and without (WoR) additional longitudinal reinforcement, enabling the identification of optimal trade-offs between structural performance and environmental impact. Design variables include the cross-sectional dimensions, concrete compressive strength, steel yield strength, and reinforcement configuration. The resulting Pareto-optimal solutions are further evaluated using a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on Minkowski Metrics combined with Entropy Theory to identify the best overall compromise solution. The numerical results demonstrate that the use of high-strength materials can reduce embodied CO2 emissions by up to 16% in the analyzed cases. The implemented load-bearing capacity formulation was also validated against experimental results, yielding a mean Nexp/NNBR16239 ratio of 1.01 for the six specimens analyzed. The multi-objective formulation associated with Minkowski metrics produces a robust tool for determining the best solutions in general, as well as the best solutions related to the maximum load that the columns can support. Finally, for both the single-objective and multi-objective problem analyses, increasing the slenderness of the columns resulted in more costly solutions, both economically and environmentally.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 10(10)
Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Topology Optimization in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.